|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
The Varieties of Pathways to Dysfluent ReadingComparing Subtypes of Children With Dyslexia at Letter, Word, and Connected Text Levels of Reading
Tami Katzir
Haifa University, Mount Carmel, Israel
Young-Suk Kim
Florida State University, Tallahassee, and Florida Center for Reading Research
Maryanne Wolf
Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts
Robin Morris
Georgia State University, Atlanta
Maureen W. Lovett
University of Toronto, Ontario
The majority of work on the double-deficit hypothesis (DDH) of dyslexia has been done at the letter and word levels of reading. Key research questions addressed in this study are (a) do readers with different subtypes of dyslexia display differences in fluency at particular reading levels (e.g., letter, word, and connected text)? and (b) do children with dyslexia identified by either low-achievement or ability—achievement discrepancy criteria show similar differences when classified by the DDH? To address these questions, the authors assessed a sample of 158 children with severe reading impairments in second and third grades on an extensive battery and classified them into three reader subtypes using the DDH. The results demonstrated that the three DDH subtypes exhibited differences in fluency at different levels of reading (letter, word, and connected text), underscoring the separate reading profiles of these subtypes and the different possible routes to dysfluency in reading disabilities. Furthermore, the results suggest that the different patterns among DDH subtypes are primarily driven by the ability—achievement discrepancy group. The implications of these findings are discussed for intervention, reading theory, and a more refined understanding of heterogeneity.
Key Words: dyslexia fluency naming speed phonological processing connected-text Double Deficit Hypothesis classification early identification/intervention
References
- Badian, N.A. (1997). Dyslexia and the double deficit hypothesis. Annals of Dyslexia, 47, 69—88.[CrossRef]
- Ben Dror, I., Frost, R., & Bentin, S. (1995). Orthographic representation and phonemic segmentation in skilled readers: A cross-language comparison. Psychological Science, 6, 176—181.[CrossRef]
- Berninger, V.W., Abbott, R.D., Billingsley, F., & Nagy, W. (2001). Processes underlying timing and fluency of reading: Efficiency, automaticity, coordination, and morphological awareness. In M. Wolf (Ed.), Time, fluency, and dyslexia (pp. 383—415). Parkton, MD: York.
- Bowers, P., Sunseth, K., & Golden, J. (1999). The route between rapid naming and reading progress. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 31—53.[CrossRef]
- Bowers, P.G., & Wolf, M. (1993). Theoretical links among naming speed, precise timing mechanisms and orthographic skill in dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 5, 69—85.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Breznitz, Z. (2006). Reading fluency: Synchronization of processes. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Breznitz, Z., & Share, D.L. (1992). Effects of accelerated reading on memory of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 193—199.[CrossRef]
- Carver, R.P. (1997). Reading for one second, one minute, or one year from the perspective of Rauding theory. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 3—42.[CrossRef]
- Catts, H.W. (1996). Defining dyslexia as a development language disorder: An expanded view. Topics in Language Disorders, 16, 14—29.
- Cohen, M., Durant, R.H., & Cook, C. (1988). The Conners Teacher Rating Scale: Effects of age, sex, and race with special education children. Psychology in the Schools, 25, 195—202.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Coltheart, M., & Jackson, N. (1998). Defining dyslexia. Child Psychology and Psychiatry Review, 3, 12—16.[CrossRef]
- Compton, D.L., & Carlisle, J.F. (1994). Speed of word recognition as a distinguishing characteristic of reading disabilities. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 115—140.[CrossRef]
- Denckla, M.B., & Rudel, R.G. (1976). Rapid automatized naming (RAN): Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities. Neuropsychologia, 14, 471—479.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Farmer, M.E., & Klein, R.M. (1995). The evidence for a temporal processing deficit linked to dyslexia: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2, 460—493.
- Fischer, K.W., & Pare-Blagoev, J. (2000). From individual differences to dynamic pathways of development. Child Development, 71, 850—853.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Fischer, K.W., & Pipp, S.L. (1984). Processes of cognitive development: Optimal level and skill acquisition. In R. J. Steinberg (Ed.), Mechanisms of cognitive development (pp. 45—80). San Francisco: Freeman.
- Habib, M. (2000). The neurological basis of developmental dyslexia: An overview and working hypothesis. Brain, 123, 2373—2399.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Kame'enui, E.J., Simmons, D.C., Good, R.H., & Harn, B.A. (2001). The use of fluency-based measures in early identification and evaluation of intervention efficacy in schools. In M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain (pp. 307—333). Timonium, MD: York.
- Katzir, T., Kim, Y., Wolf, M., Kennedy, B., Morris, R., Lovett, M. (2006). The relationship of spelling recognition, RAN, and phonological awareness to reading skills in older poor readers and younger reading-matched controls. Reading and Writing, 18(8), 845—872.
- Kaufman, A., & Kaufman, N. (1990). K-BIT: Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
- Kirby, J., Parrila, R., & Pfeiffer, S. (2003). Naming speed and phonological awareness as predictors of reading development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 453—464.[CrossRef]
- Levy, B.A., Bourassa, D.C., & Horn, C. (1999). Fast and slow namers: Benefits of segmentation and whole word training. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 73, 115—138.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Levy, B.A., & Carr, T.H. (1990). Component process analyses: Conclusion and challenges. In T. H. Carr & B. A. Levy (Eds.), Reading and its development: Component skills approaches (pp. 423—428). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
- Levy, B.A., & Lysynchuk, L. (1997). Beginning word recognition: Benefits of training by segmentation and whole word methods. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 359—387.[CrossRef]
- Lovett, M.W. (1987). A developmental approach to reading disability: Accuracy and speed criteria of normal and deficient reading skill. Child Development, 58, 234—260.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Lovett, M.W., Steinbach, K.A., & Frijters, J.C. (2000). Remediating the core deficits of developmental reading disability: A double-deficit perspective. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 334—358.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Manis, F.R., Doi, L.M., & Bhadha, B. (2000). Naming speed, phonological awareness, and orthographic knowledge in second graders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 325—333.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Manis, F.R., Seidenberg, M.S., & Doi, L.M. (1999). See Dick RAN: Rapid naming and the longitudinal prediction of reading subskills in first and second graders. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 129—157.[CrossRef]
- Markwardt, F.C. (1989). Peabody Individual Achievement Test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
- Meyer, M.S., & Felton, R.H. (1999). Repeated reading to enhance fluency: Old approaches and new directions. Annals of Dyslexia, 49, 283—306.[CrossRef]
- O'Rourke, A.G. (2002). Beyond definition and differentiation: Reconceptualizing the role of intelligence measures in reading disability classification research. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Tufts University, Malden, MA.
- Schatschneider, C., Carlson, C.D., Francis, D.J., Foorman, B.R., & Fletcher, J.M. (2002). Relationship of rapid automatized naming and phonological awareness in early reading development: Implications for the double-deficit hypothesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 245—256.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Share, D.L., McGee, R., & Silva, P.A. (1989). IQ and reading progress: A test of the capacity notion of IQ. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 28, 97—100.[Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Shaywitz, S.E., Shaywitz, B.A., Fletcher, J.M., & Escobar, M.D. (1990). Prevalence of reading disability in boys and girls: Results of the Connecticut Longitudinal Study. Journal of the American Medical Association, 264, 998—1002.[CrossRef]
- Siegel, L. (1992). A multivariate model for the early detection of learning disabilities. In C. W. Greenbaum & J. G. Auerbach (Eds.), Longitudinal studies of children at psychological risk: Cross-national perspectives (pp. 99—108). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
- Siegel, L. (1993). The cognitive basics of dyslexia. In R. Pasnak & M. L. Howe (Eds.), Emerging themes in cognitive development (Vol. 2, pp. 33—52). New York: Springer Verlag.
- Siegel, L. (2003). Basic cognitive processes and reading disabilities. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 158—182). New York: Guilford.
- Stanovich, K.E. (1989). Has the learning disabilities field lost its intelligence? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 487—492.[Free Full Text]
- Stanovich, K. (1991). Changing models of reading and reading acquisition. In L. Rieben & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read: Basic research and its implications (pp. 19—31). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Stanovich, K., & Siegel, L.A. (1994). Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 24—53.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Stevens, J. (1996). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., & Rashotte, C.A. (1999). Test of Word Reading Efficiency (TOWRE). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
- Vukovic, R.K., & Siegel, L.S. (2006). The double-deficit hypothesis: A comprehensive analysis of the evidence. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 25—47.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Wagner, R.K., Torgesen, J.K., & Rashotte, C.A. (1999). Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing (CTOPP). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
- Wechsler, D. (1991). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
- Wiederholt, J.L., & Bryant, B.R. (1992). Gray Oral Reading Test. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
- Wolf, M. (1999). What time may tell: Towards a new conceptualization of developmental dyslexia. The Norman Geschwind Memorial Lecture. Annals of Dyslexia, 43, 1—28.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Wolf, M., Bally, H., & Morris, R. (1986). Automaticity, retrieval processes, and reading: A longitudinal study in average and impaired readers. Child Development, 57, 988—1000.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Wolf, M., & Bowers, P. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 1—24.
- Wolf, M., & Bowers, P. (2000). The question of naming-speed deficits in developmental reading disabilities: An introduction to the double-deficit hypothesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 322—324.[Free Full Text]
- Wolf, M., & Denckla, M.B. (2005). Rapid Automatized Naming and Rapid Alternating Stimulus tests (RAN/RAS). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
- Wolf, M., & Katzir-Cohen, T. (2001). Reading fluency and its intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 211—239.[CrossRef]
- Wolf, M., O'Rourke, A.G., Gidney, C., Lovett, M.W., Cirino, P., & Morris, R. (2002). The second deficit: An investigation of the independence of phonological and naming-speed deficits in developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15, 43—72.[CrossRef]
- Woodcock, R.W. (1987). Woodcock Reading Mastery Test—Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
- Young, A., & Bowers, P.G. (1995). Individual differences and text difficulty determinants of reading fluency and expressiveness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 60, 438—454.
Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 41, No. 1,
47-66 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0022219407311325

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. C. Papadopoulos, G. K. Georgiou, and P. Kendeou
Investigating the Double-Deficit Hypothesis in Greek: Findings From a Longitudinal Study
J Learn Disabil,
November 1, 2009;
42(6):
528 - 547.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|