|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 40, No. 6,
508-525 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/00222194070400060301
Effectiveness of Paraeducator-Supplemented Individual InstructionBeyond Basic Decoding Skills
Patricia F. Vadasy
Washington Research Institute, pvadasy{at}wri-edu.org
Elizabeth A. Sanders
Department of Educational Psychology, University of Washington, and is research analyst at Washington Research Institute
Sarah Tudor
Washington Research Institute
A total of 46 children in Grades 2 and 3 with low word-level skills were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups that received supplemental phonics-based reading instruction. One group received intervention October through March (21.5 hours), and one group served as a control from October through March and later received intervention March through May (17.5 hours). Paraeducators trained in a standard treatment protocol provided individual instruction for 30 min per day, 4 days per week. At the March posttest, the early treatment (ET; n = 23) group outperformed the controls (late treatment, LT; n = 20) on reading accuracy and passage fluency. Across both groups, second graders outperformed third graders on these same measures. At the 3-month follow-up, the ET group showed no evidence of decline in reading accuracy, passage fluency, or words spelled; however, 3rd-grade ET students had significantly higher spelling skills compared to 2nd graders. The LT group demonstrated significant growth during their intervention in reading accuracy and spelling, but not passage fluency. When we compared the ET and LT groups on their gains per instructional hour, we found that the ET group made significantly greater gains than the LT group across all 3 measures. The results support the value of paraeducator-supplemented reading instruction for students below grade level in word identification and reading fluency.
References
- Abbott, S.P., & Berninger, V.W. (1999). It's never too late to remediate: Teaching word recognition to students with reading disabilities in Grades 4—7. Annals of Dyslexia, 49, 223—250.
- Agronin, M.E., Holahan, J.M., Shaywitz, B.A., & Shaywitz, S.E. (1992). The MultiGrade Inventory for Teachers (MIT): Scale development, reliability, and validity of an instrument to assess children with attention deficits and learning disabilities. In S. E. Shaywitz & B. A. Shaywitz (Eds.), Attention deficit disorder comes of age: Toward the twenty-first century (pp. 98—116). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
- Allor, J., & McCathren, R. (2004). The efficacy of an early literacy tutoring program implemented by college students. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 19, 116— 129.
- Archer, A.L., Gleason, M.M., Vachon, V., & Hollenbeck, K. (2001). Instructional strategies for teaching struggling fourth and fifth grade students to read long words. Unpublished manuscript.
- Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 57, 289—300.
- Berninger, V., & Traweek, D. (1991). Effects of a two-phase reading intervention on three orthographic-phonological code connections. Learning and Individual Differences, 3, 323—338.[CrossRef]
- Berninger, V.W., Vermeulen, K., Abbott, R.D., McCutchen, D., Cotton, S., Cude, J., et al. (2003). Comparison of three approaches to supplementary reading instruction for low-achieving second-grade readers. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 34, 101—116.[CrossRef]
- Bhattacharya, A., & Ehri, L.C. (2004). Graphosyllabic analysis helps adolescent struggling readers read and spell words. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 331— 348.
- Blachman, B., Ball, E.W., Black, R.S., & Tan-gel, D.M. (1994). Kindergarten teachers develop phoneme awareness in low-income inner-city children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 6, 1—18.[CrossRef]
- Bradley, L., & Bryant, P.E. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read—A causal connection. Nature, 301, 419—421.[CrossRef]
- Brown, K.J., Morris, D., & Fields, M. (2005). Intervention after Grade 1: Serving increased numbers of struggling readers e fectively. Journal of Literacy Research. Retrieved October 27, 2005, from http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qu:3785/is_200504/ai_n13638860
- Byrne, B., & Fielding-Barnsley, R. (1991). Evaluation of a program to teach phonemic awareness to young children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 451—455.[CrossRef]
- Chall, J.S. (1995). Stages of reading development (2nd ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace.
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Cunningham, A.E., Perry, K.E., Stanovich, K.E., & Stanovich, P.J. (2004). Disciplinary knowledge of K—3 teachers and their knowledge calibration in the domain of early literacy. Annals of Dyslexia, 54, 139—166.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Dunn, L.M., & Dunn, L.M. (1997). Peabody picture vocabulary test (3rd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
- Ehri, L.C. (1995). Phases of development in learning to read words by sight. Journal of Research in Reading, 18, 116—125.[CrossRef]
- Ehri, L.C. (1998). Grapheme—phoneme knowledge is essential for learning to read words in English. In J. L. Metsala & L. C. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 3—40). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Ehri, L.C., & Wilce, L.S. (1983). Development of word identification speed in skilled and less skilled beginning readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 3—18.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Elbaum, B., Vaughn, S., Hughes, M.T., & Moody, S.W. (2000). How effective are one-to-one tutoring programs in reading for elementary students at risk for reading failure? A meta-analysis of the intervention research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 605—619.[CrossRef]
- Fielding-Barnsley, R. (1997). Explicit instruction in decoding benefits children high in phonemic awareness and alphabet knowledge. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 85—98.[CrossRef]
- Foorman, B.R., Francis, D.J., Fletcher, J.M., Schatschneider, B.A., & Mehta, P. (1998). The role of instruction in learning to read: Preventing reading failure in at-risk students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 37—55.[CrossRef]
- Foorman, B.R., Novy, D.M., Francis, D.J., & Liberman, D. (1991). How letter-sound instruction mediates progress in first-grade reading and spelling. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 456—469.[CrossRef]
- French, N.K. (2003). Paraeducators in special education programs. Focus on Exceptional Children. Retrieved January 14, 2006, from http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3813/is_200310/ai_n9342171
- Good, R.H., & Kaminski, R.A. (2002). Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for Development of Educational Achievement.
- Good, R., Kaminski, R., Smith, S., & Bratten, J. (2001). Technical adequacy of second-grade DIBELS oral reading fluency (Technical Report No. 8). Eugene: University of Oregon.
- Gunn, B., Biglan, A., Smolkowski, K., & Ary, D. (2000). The efficacy of supplemental instruction in decoding skills for Hispanic and non-Hispanic students in early elementary school. The Journal of Special Education, 34, 90—103.
- Gunn, B., Smolkowski, K., Biglan, A., & Black, C. (2002). Supplemental instruction in decoding skills for Hispanic and non-Hispanic students in early elementary school: A follow-up. The Journal of Special Education, 36, 69—79.
- Gunn, B., Smolkowski, K., Biglan, A., Black, C., & Blair, J. (2005). Fostering the development of reading skill through supplemental instruction: Results for Hispanic and non-Hispanic students. The Journal of Special Education, 39, 66—85.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Henry, M.K. (1989). Beyond phonics: Integrated decoding and spelling instruction based on word origin and structure. Annals of Dyslexia, 38, 258—275.
- Henry, M.K. (1993). Morphological structure: Latin and Greek roots and affixes as upper grade code strategies. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5, 227—241.[CrossRef]
- Hiebert, E.H. (2003). Quick Reads: A research-based fluency program. Parsippany, NJ: Pearson Education.
- Hochberg, Y. (1988). A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika, 75, 800—802.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Holland, B.S., & Copenhaver, M. (1988). Improved Bonferroni-type multiple testing procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 145—149.[CrossRef]
- Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6, 65—70.
- Jaccard, J., & Guilamo-Ramos, V. (2002). Analysis of variance frameworks in clinical child and adolescent psychology: Issues and recommendations. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 31, 130—146.
- Jastak, S., & Wilkinson, G.S. (1984). Wide range achievement test—Revised. Wilmington, DE: Jastak.
- Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 437—447.[CrossRef]
- Lee, V.E., & Burkam, D.T. (2002). Inequality at the starting gate: Social di ferences in achievement as children begin school. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
- Lovett, M.W., Borden, S.L., DeLuca, T., Lacerenza, L., Benson, N.J., & Brackstone, D. (1994). Treating the core deficits of developmental dyslexia: Evidence of transfer of learning after phonologically and strategy-based reading training programs. Developmental Psychology, 30, 805— 822.[CrossRef]
- Lovett, M.W., & Steinbach, K.A. (1997). The effectiveness of remedial programs for reading disabled children of different ages: Does the benefit decrease for older children? Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 189—210.[CrossRef]
- McGuinness, C., McGuinness, D., & McGuinness, G. (1996). Phono-Graphix: A new method for remediating reading difficulties. Annals of Dyslexia, 46, 73—96.[CrossRef]
- Morris, D., Shaw, B., & Perney, J. (1990). Helping low readers in Grades 2 and 3: An after-school volunteer tutoring program. The Elementary School Journal, 91, 133—150.
- National Center for Education Statistics. (2004). Table 80. Staff employed in public school systems by type of assignment and state or jurisdiction: Fall, 2002. In Digest of education statistics: Chapter 2. Elementary and secondary education. Retrieved February 25, 2006, from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d04
- Parrila, R., Aunola, K., Leskinen, E., Nurmi, J., & Kirby, J.R. (2005). Development of individual differences in reading: Results from longitudinal studies in English and Finnish. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 299—319.[CrossRef]
- Perie, M., Grigg, W.S., & Donahue, P.L. (2005, October). The nation's report card: Reading 2005. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
- Rashotte, C.A., MacPhee, K., & Torgesen, J.K. (2001). The effectiveness of a group reading instruction program with poor readers in multiple grades. Learning Disability Quarterly, 24, 119—134.[CrossRef]
- Rashotte, C.A., Torgesen, J.K., & Wagner, R.K. (1997, September). The fluency problem in the remediation of disabled readers: Beyond accuracy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Association for Dyslexia, Miami, FL.
- Shaywitz, S.E. (1987). Multigrade inventory for teachers. New Haven, CT: Yale University School of Medicine.
- Snow, C.E., Burns, M.S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading di ficulties in young children: Committee on the prevention of reading di ficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- Spear-Swerling, L., Brucker, P.O., & Alfano, M. (2005). Teachers' literacy-related knowledge and self-perceptions in relation to preparation and experience. Annals of Dyslexia, 55, 266—293.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Spss. (1989—2004). SPSS 13.0 for Windows [Computer software]. Chicago, IL: Author.
- Simmons, D.C., Kame'enui, E.J., Stool-miller, M., Coyne, M., & Harn, B. (2003). Accelerating growth and maintaining proficiency: A two-year intervention study of kindergarten and first-grade children at risk for reading difficulties. In B. R. Foorman (Ed.), Preventing and remediating reading di ficulties: Bringing science to scale (pp. 197—228). Baltimore: York Press.
- Stevens, J.P. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (4th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Tindal, G., Hasbrouck, J., & Jones, C. (2005). Oral reading fluency: 90 years of measurement (Technical Report No. 33). Eugene: University of Oregon, College of Education, Department of Behavioral Research and Teaching.
- Torgesen, J.K., Alexander, A.W., Wagner, R.K., Rashotte, C.A., Voeller, K., & Conway, T. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 33—58, 78.
- Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., & Rashotte, C.A. (1997). Approaches to the prevention and remediation of phonologically based reading disabilities. In B. Blachman (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia: Implications for early intervention (pp. 287—304). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., Rashotte, C.A., Rose, E., Lindamood, P., Conway, T., et al. (1999). Preventing reading failure in young children with phonological processing disabilities: Group and individual responses to instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 579—593.[CrossRef]
- Vachon, V.L., & Gleason, M.M. (2001). The e fects of mastery teaching and varying practice contexts on middle school students' acquisition of multisyllabic word reading strategies. Unpublished manuscript.
- Vadasy, P.F., Jenkins, J.R., & Pool, K. (2000). Effects of tutoring in phonological and early reading skills on students at risk for reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 579—590.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Vadasy, P.F., Sanders, E.A., Jenkins, J.R., & Peyton, J.A. (2002). Timing and intensity of tutoring: A closer look at the conditions for effective early literacy tutoring. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 17, 227—241.[CrossRef]
- Vadasy, P.F., Sanders, E.A., & Peyton, J.A. (2005). Relative effectiveness of reading practice or word-level instruction in supplemental tutoring: How text matters. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 364— 380.
- Vadasy, P.F., Sanders, E.A., & Peyton, J.A. (2006a). Code-oriented instruction for kindergarten students at risk for reading difficulties: A randomized field trial with paraeducator implementers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 508—528.[CrossRef]
- Vadasy, P.F., Sanders, E.A., & Peyton, J.A. (2006b). Paraeducator-supplemented instruction in structural analysis with text reading practice for second and third graders at risk for reading problems. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 365-378..[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Vellutino, F.R., Scanlon, D.M., Sipay, E.R., Small, S.G., Pratt, A.C., Chen, R., et al. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 601—638.[CrossRef]
- Wasik, B. (1998). Volunteer tutoring programs in reading: A review. Reading Research Quarterly, 33, 266—292.[CrossRef]
- Wise, B.W., Ring, J., & Olson, R.K. (1999). Training phonological awareness with and without explicit attention to articulation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72, 271—304.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Woodcock, R. (1987). Woodcock reading mastery test—Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
- Woodcock, R. (1998). Woodcock reading mastery test—Revised/Normative update. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati What's this?
|
