Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Learning Disabilities
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ackerman, P. T.
Right arrow Articles by Dykman, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ackerman, P. T.
Right arrow Articles by Dykman, R. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Children with Specific Learning Disabilities

Bender Gestalt Test Findings and Other Signs

Peggy T. Ackerman, M.A.

John E. Peters, M.D.

Roscoe A. Dykman, Ph.D.

The Bender Visual-Motor Gestalt Test protocols of 82 elementary school boys with learning disabilities were scored for developmental errors using the Koppitz system. Sixty-seven % of the children with learning disabilites (CLD), as compared with only 44% of a group of 34 controls, made more errors than the mean for children of equivalent ages in Koppitz's normative sample. Whereas controls with below average Bender scores were no different from controls with adequate Bender scores on any WISC subtest, CLD with subaverage Benders scored significantly lower on Information, Arithmetic, Picture Completion, Block Design, and Mazes than CLD with adequate protocols. Lower WISC IQs were coupled with poor Bender reproductions in 45% of CLD but in only 21% of the controls. The CLD with classical neurological signs did not have a reliably higher incidence of poor Bender scores than the CLD without classical signs.

Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 4, No. 8, 437-446 (1971)
DOI: 10.1177/002221947100400805


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Special EducationHome page
L. Eno and J. Deichmann
A Review of the Bender Gestalt Test as a Screening Instrument for Brain Damage With School-Aged Children of Normal Intelligence Since 1970
Journal of Special Education, April 1, 1980; 14(1): 37 - 45.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Special EducationHome page
J. T. Dalby
Deficit or Delay: Neuropsychological Models of Developmental Dyslexia
Journal of Special Education, October 1, 1979; 13(3): 239 - 264.
[Abstract] [PDF]