Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Learning Disabilities
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jorstad, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Jorstad, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Psycholinguistic Learning Disabilities in 20 Mexican-American Students

Dorothy Jorstad, M.A., M.S.

Coachella, California

In a rural elementary school in southern California, where the population is 83 percent Mexican—American, twenty students (all Mexican—American) who were having severe reading difficulties were given the Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities. Composite profiles were made of these twenty students' differential abilities. All of the points falling below the average on the composite profiles of all of the students' mean scores were in auditory areas (listed in order of disability): Grammatic Closure, Auditory Closure, Auditory Association, Auditory Reception, Sound Blending, and Auditov Memory. Because the ITPA findings pointed up the need for additional help in auditory areas in teaching language to Mexican—American students, curriculum emphases and instructional procedures have been modified.

Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 4, No. 3, 143-149 (1971)
DOI: 10.1177/002221947100400304


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
J. K. Klingner, A. J. Artiles, and L. M. Barletta
English Language Learners Who Struggle With Reading: Language Acquisition or LD?
J Learn Disabil, April 1, 2006; 39(2): 108 - 128.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication Disorders QuarterlyHome page
C. W. Snider, R. E. Potter, and K. B. Kennedy
Language Comprehension Differences Exhibited by Kindergarten and Second Grade Nez Perce Indian and Caucasian Children
Communication Disorders Quarterly, January 1, 1983; 6(2): 110 - 116.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Special EducationHome page
J. M. Humphrey and J. A. Rice
An Evaluation of Several Methods of Predicting Full-Scale IQ from the ITPA
Journal of Special Education, July 1, 1973; 7(2): 133 - 140.
[PDF]