This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Berninger, V. W. Articles by Fulton, C. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Berninger, V. W. Articles by Fulton, C. M. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Paths to Reading Comprehension in At-Risk Second-Grade Readers

University of Washington, vwb{at}u.washington.edu

Robert D. Abbott

University of Washington

Karin Vermeulen

Fairfax County Public Schools in Virginia

Cynthia M. Fulton

Shelburne, Vermont

Two studies of second graders at risk for reading disability, which were guided by levels of language and functional reading system theory, focused on reading comprehension in this population. In Study 1 (n = 96), confirmatory factor analysis of five comprehension measures loaded on one factor in both fall and spring of second grade. Phonological decoding predicted accuracy of real-word reading; automatic letter naming predicted rate of real-word reading; accuracy and rate of both real-word reading (more so than decoding of pseudowords) and text reading predicted reading comprehension; and Verbal IQ also predicted reading comprehension. In Study 2 (n = 98), the treatment group (before/after school clubs receiving an integrated instructional approach that was supplementary to the general reading program) improved significantly more in phonological decoding and state standards for reading fluency than the control group (general reading program that had some code instruction but emphasized comprehension). The rate of phonological decoding explained 60.3% of real-word reading. Both treatment and control children improved significantly in reading comprehension, but controlling for pretreatment individual differences in oral vocabulary or in phonological decoding eliminated this effect. Taken together, the results of the two studies support two paths to reading comprehension: one from vocabulary and verbal reasoning, and one from written language that has multiple links between subskills: (a) alphabetic principle phonological decoding, (b) automatic phonological decoding accurate real-word reading, (c) automatic letter coding automatic word reading, and (d) automatic word reading fluent text reading. Instructional implications of both paths and the links within the written language are discussed.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?