Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Learning Disabilities
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by García, A. I.
Right arrow Articles by Hess, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by García, A. I.
Right arrow Articles by Hess, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Solving Arithmetic Word Problems

An Analysis of Classification as a Function of Difficulty in Children With and Without Arithmetic LD

Ana I. García

Developmental and Educational Psychology Department of the University of La Laguna, aigarcia@ ull.es

Juan E. Jiménez

Developmental and Educational Psychology Department of the University of La Laguna

Stephany Hess

University of La Laguna

This study was designed to determine a word problem difficulty classification in children with arithmetic learning disabilities (ALD; n = 104) in comparison with typically achieving students (n = 44). We tested variables such as (a) semantic structure (Change, Combine, Compare, and Equalize), (b) operation (subtraction and addition), and (c) position of the unknown quantity in the problem. Facet theory with multidimensional scaling techniques (MINISSA) was used to analyze the underlying dimensions in the responses of each group of participants. Our results indicate that although the word problem difficulty classifications for the 2 groups of children were different, the position of the unknown quantity had a greater influence on the level of difficulty of story problems than other variables. The noncanonical problems—specifically, those with the unknown term in the first place—although difficult for both groups of children, were the most difficult problems for children with ALD.

Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 39, No. 3, 270-281 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/00222194060390030601


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
S. R. Powell, L. S. Fuchs, D. Fuchs, P. T. Cirino, and J. M. Fletcher
Do Word-Problem Features Differentially Affect Problem Difficulty as a Function of Students' Mathematics Difficulty With and Without Reading Difficulty?
J Learn Disabil, March 1, 2009; 42(2): 99 - 110.
[Abstract] [PDF]