This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Liederman, J. Articles by Flannery, K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Liederman, J. Articles by Flannery, K. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Male Vulnerability to Reading Disability Is Not Likely to Be a Myth

A Call for New Data

Brain Behavior and Cognition Program at Boston University

Lore Kantrowitz

McLean Hospital

Kathleen Flannery

Saint Anselm College

Whether boys are more vulnerable than girls to reading disabilities (RD) is controversial. We review studies that were designed to minimize ascertainment bias in the selection of individuals with RD. These include population-based studies that identified children with RD by objective, unbiased methods and studies that examined the gender ratios among the affected relatives of those diagnosed with RD. We conclude that even when ascertainment biases are minimized, there is still a significant preponderance of boys with RD, although the gender ratio of the affected relatives of those with RD manifests the weakest male bias. Furthermore, we demonstrate that potentially confounding factors such as attentional or neurological problems, race, IQ, and severity of RD cannot account for the observed gender bias. We end with a clarion call to future researchers to (a) consider analyzing gender differences by means of more than one definition of RD, (b) compare gender ratios when boys and girls are ranked against the performance of their own gender as opposed to an average across genders, and (c) report group differences in variability and effect sizes of obtained gender ratios.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Dirks, G. Spyer, E. C. D. M. van Lieshout, and L. de Sonneville Prevalence of Combined Reading and Arithmetic Disabilities J Learn Disabil, September 1, 2008; 41(5): 460 - 473. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. S. Siegel and I. S. Smythe Reflections on Research on Reading Disability with Special Attention to Gender Issues J Learn Disabil, October 1, 2005; 38(5): 473 - 477. [Abstract] [PDF]