Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Learning Disabilities
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reid, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Weatherly Valle, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reid, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Weatherly Valle, J.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Learning Disorders
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Discursive Practice of Learning Disability

Implications for Instruction and Parent—School Relations

D. Kim Reid

Department of Curriculum and Teaching at Teachers College, Columbia University

Jan Weatherly Valle

School of Education at the City College of New York

This article serves as an invitation to rethink and to broaden the scope of learning disabilities (LD) research and practice. We begin with 3 assumptions: Education in a representative democracy is inevitably a political enterprise; social justice is everyone's responsibility, but educators have a special role to play; and segregated schooling is neither equal nor equitable. After an analysis of the primary extant discourses, we argue for a more comprehensive and more openly political vision of the LD field, which we think is supported by Disability Studies in Education. Finally, we draw 3 conclusions relevant to our collective work as researchers and educators. First, learning disabilities are not objective fact; they are historically and culturally determined. Second, disability is both a personal and a societal attribute. Finally, learning disabilities are not and have never been immutable. We contend that we are ethically bound to transform educational practices to both welcome and accommodate everybody's children.

Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 37, No. 6, 466-481 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/00222194040370060101


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
J. Ryan
Learning Disabilities in Australian Universities: Hidden, Ignored, and Unwelcome
J Learn Disabil, October 1, 2007; 40(5): 436 - 442.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Disability Policy StudiesHome page
E. C. Bouck
Lost in Translation?: Educating Secondary Students With Mild Mental Impairment
Journal of Disability Policy Studies, January 1, 2007; 18(2): 79 - 87.
[Abstract] [PDF]