Journal of Learning Disabilities

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bhattacharya, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ehri, L. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bhattacharya, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ehri, L. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 37, No. 4, 331-348 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/00222194040370040501
© 2004 Hammill Institute on Disabilities

Graphosyllabic Analysis Helps Adolescent Struggling Readers Read and Spell Words

Alpana Bhattacharya

Queens College of the City University of New York, abhattac{at}qc1.qc.edu

Linnea C. Ehri

Graduate Center of the City University of New York

Adolescents with word-reading skills below grade level were randomly assigned to one of three conditions. Those receiving interventions practiced reading 100 multisyllabic words, either by analyzing graphosyllabic units in the words or by reading the words as unanalyzed wholes. The third group received no special instruction. Posttests revealed that graphosyllabic instruction helped students to decode novel words, remember how to read words with practice, and remember the spellings of words when compared to controls. In contrast, whole-word instruction yielded no benefit on transfer tasks compared to controls. Effects were observed primarily among adolescents reading at a third-grade—equivalent level and less so at a fourth- and fifth-grade—equivalent level. Results are consistent with a connectionist view of word learning and indicate the importance of providing struggling readers with instruction and practice in how to fully analyze the graphosyllabic constituents of words.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
LSHSSHome page
C. M. Schuele and D. Boudreau
Phonological Awareness Intervention: Beyond the Basics
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, January 1, 2008; 39(1): 3 - 20.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Remedial and Special EducationHome page
P. F. Vadasy, E. A. Sanders, and J. A. Peyton
Paraeducator-Supplemented Instruction in Structural Analysis With Text Reading Practice for Second and Third Graders at Risk for Reading Problems
Remedial and Special Education, December 1, 2006; 27(6): 365 - 378.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Remedial and Special EducationHome page
A. Bhattacharya
Syllable-Based Reading Strategy for Mastery of Scientific Information
Remedial and Special Education, April 1, 2006; 27(2): 116 - 123.
[Abstract] [PDF]