Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Learning Disabilities
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coyne, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Harn, B. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Coyne, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Harn, B. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Beginning Reading Intervention as Inoculation or Insulin

First-Grade Reading Performance of Strong Responders to Kindergarten Intervention

Michael D. Coyne

Neag School of Education, University of Connecticut, mcoyne{at}uconn.edu

Edward J. Kame'enui

Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement in the College of Education at the University of Oregon

Deborah C. Simmons

Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement at the University of Oregon

Beth A. Harn

University of Oregon

This study examined the first-grade reading progress of children who participated in an intensive beginning reading intervention in kindergarten. Specifically, the study investigated whether kindergarten intervention could prevent first-grade reading difficulties, or produce an "inoculation" effect, for some children under certain instructional conditions. Participants included children at risk for developing reading difficulties who received a 7-month beginning reading intervention in kindergarten. In October of first grade, 59 children who had achieved criterion levels on measures of phonological awareness and alphabetic knowledge were randomly assigned to one of two types of first-grade reading instruction: (a) code-based classroom instruction and a supplemental maintenance intervention, or (b) only code-based classroom instruction. February posttest measures assessed oral reading fluency, word reading, nonword reading, and comprehension. Between-group analyses indicated that instructional groups did not differ on any posttest measure. The students' absolute levels of achievement were compared to national and local normative samples. These results indicated that between 75% and 100% of students in both conditions attained posttest levels and demonstrated growth comparable to their average-achieving peers. These results support the hypothesis that strong responders to kindergarten intervention can experience an inoculation effect through the middle of first grade with research-validated classroom reading instruction.

Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 37, No. 2, 90-104 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/00222194040370020101


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
B. M. Phillips, C. J. Lonigan, and M. A. Wyatt
Predictive Validity of the Get Ready to Read! Screener: Concurrent and Long-Term Relations With Reading-Related Skills
J Learn Disabil, March 1, 2009; 42(2): 133 - 147.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
D. Kamps, M. Abbott, C. Greenwood, H. Wills, M. Veerkamp, and J. Kaufman
Effects of Small-Group Reading Instruction and Curriculum Differences for Students Most at Risk in Kindergarten: Two-Year Results for Secondary- and Tertiary-Level Interventions
J Learn Disabil, April 1, 2008; 41(2): 101 - 114.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
B. A. Harn, S. Linan-Thompson, and G. Roberts
Intensifying Instruction: Does Additional Instructional Time Make a Difference for the Most At-Risk First Graders?
J Learn Disabil, April 1, 2008; 41(2): 115 - 125.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Positive Behavior InterventionsHome page
R. M. Stewart, G. J. Benner, R. C. Martella, and N. E. Marchand-Martella
Three-Tier Models of Reading and Behavior: A Research Review
Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, October 1, 2007; 9(4): 239 - 253.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Assessment for Effective InterventionHome page
M. D. Burke and S. Hagan-Burke
Concurrent Criterion-Related Validity of Early Literacy Indicators for Middle of First Grade
Assessment for Effective Intervention, January 1, 2007; 32(2): 66 - 77.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
R. E. O'Connor, K. R. Harty, and D. Fulmer
Tiers of Intervention in Kindergarten Through Third Grade
J Learn Disabil, December 1, 2005; 38(6): 532 - 538.
[Abstract] [PDF]