Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Learning Disabilities
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tournaki, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tournaki, N.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Learning Disorders
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Differential Effects of Teaching Addition Through Strategy Instruction Versus Drill and Practice to Students With and Without Learning Disabilities

Nelly Tournaki

College of Staten Island, The City University of New York

Forty-two second-grade general education students and 42 students with learning disabilities (LD) were taught basic, one-digit addition facts (e.g., 5 + 3 = __). Students received instruction via (a) a minimum addend strategy, (b) drill and practice, or (c) control. The effectiveness of the two methods was measured through students' accuracy and latency scores on a posttest and a transfer task (e.g., 5 + 3 + 7 = __). Students with LD improved significantly only in the strategy condition, as compared to drill-and-practice and control conditions, whereas general education students improved significantly both in the strategy and the drill-and-practice conditions as compared to the control condition. However, in the transfer task, students from all groups became significantly more accurate only in the strategy condition, while all students were significantly faster than their control group peers regardless of teaching method. The implications for teachers' differential choices of methods of instruction for students with different learning characteristics are discussed.

Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 36, No. 5, 449-458 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/00222194030360050601


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
R. Gersten, D. J. Chard, M. Jayanthi, S. K. Baker, P. Morphy, and J. Flojo
Mathematics Instruction for Students With Learning Disabilities: A Meta-Analysis of Instructional Components
Review of Educational Research, September 1, 2009; 79(3): 1202 - 1242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
S. Hopkins and H. Egeberg
Retrieval of Simple Addition Facts: Complexities Involved in Addressing a Commonly Identified Mathematical Learning Difficulty
J Learn Disabil, May 1, 2009; 42(3): 215 - 229.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
L. S. Fuchs, D. Fuchs, C. L. Hamlet, S. R. Powell, A. M. Capizzi, and P. M. Seethaler
The Effects of Computer-Assisted Instruction on Number Combination Skill in At-Risk First Graders
J Learn Disabil, October 1, 2006; 39(5): 467 - 475.
[Abstract] [PDF]