Journal of Learning Disabilities

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Howes, N.-L.
Right arrow Articles by Lawson, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Howes, N.-L.
Right arrow Articles by Lawson, J. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 36, No. 3, 230-246 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/002221940303600303

Memory Performance of Children with Dyslexia

A Comparative Analysis of Theoretical Perspectives

Nancy-Louise Howes

Utah State Hospital

Erin D. Bigler

Brigham Young University and chair of the Psychology Department, University of Utah

Gary M. Burlingame

Brigham Young University

John S. Lawson

Brigham Young University

This study examined the memory performance of children with reading disabilities (RD) using methodology representative of three theoretical perspectives on RD subtypes: the phonological deficit, dual route, and phonological-core variable-difference models. Analyses compared the serial memory, verbal learning, and abstract visual-spatial memory performance of 45 children with RD to that of chronological-age (CA)- and reading-level (RL)-matched controls, using subtype identification methods from each of the theoretical models to classify children with RD. Phonological deficit and dual route comparisons indicated that children with RD, regardless of subtype, performed more poorly than CA- and better than RL-matched participants on all memory tasks. Phonological-core variable-difference methodology yielded three RD subtypes, two of which exhibited distinctive memory deficits relative to both CA and RL control groups. The phonological-core variable-difference model accounted for more variance in memory performance than either of the other two models.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
K. Schuchardt, C. Maehler, and M. Hasselhorn
Working Memory Deficits in Children With Specific Learning Disorders
J Learn Disabil, November 1, 2008; 41(6): 514 - 523.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
S. van der Sluis, A. van der Leij, and P. F. de Jong
Working Memory in Dutch Children with Reading- and Arithmetic-Related LD
J Learn Disabil, June 1, 2005; 38(3): 207 - 221.
[Abstract] [PDF]