This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hammill, D. D. Articles by Roberts, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hammill, D. D. Articles by Roberts, R. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Using Semantics, Grammar, Phonology, and Rapid Naming Tasks to Predict Word Identification

PRO-ED Inc., Donald D. Hammill Foundation

Nancy Mather

Department of Special Education, Rehabilitation, and School Psychology at the University of Arizona

Elizabeth A. Allen

PRO-ED, Inc

Rhia Roberts

Chapman University, San Diego

This study investigated the relative importance of semantic, grammatical, phonological, and rapid naming abilities in predicting word identification in a large, representative sample of children enrolled in first through sixth grade, using correlation, factor analysis, multiple regression, and predictive outcome analysis techniques. Composite measures of these abilities were found to correlate significantly with word identification, even after controlling for the effects of nonverbal intelligence. Factor analysis indicated that the spoken language composites and the word identification composite loaded on one factor, whereas the perceptual speed composites loaded on a second factor. Multiple regression analyses showed that among younger children in the early stages of learning to read and children whose word identifying skills were below average, the phonology and rapid naming composites accounted for the most variance in predicting word identification skills. Among older children and children who were proficient in word identification, the semantics composite accounted for the most variance. The most important analyses in this study (i.e., the calculations of the sensitivity indexes, the specificity indexes, and the positive predictive values) evaluated the practical value of using the composites to predict poor word identification skills in children. To be considered practically useful, all predictive outcome values had to be .75 or greater. None of the composites studied, including an application of the double-deficit hypothesis, met this criterion. The results from this study question the accuracy and utility of using any of the abilities studied to predict which students are at risk for or have poor word identification skills.

Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 35, No. 2, 121-136 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/002221940203500204


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. A. R. Gijsel, A. M. T. Bosman, and L. Verhoeven Kindergarten Risk Factors, Cognitive Factors, and Teacher Judgments as Predictors of Early Reading in Dutch J Learn Disabil, December 1, 2006; 39(6): 558 - 571. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. K. Vukovic and L. S. Siegel The Double-Deficit Hypothesis: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Evidence J Learn Disabil, February 1, 2006; 39(1): 25 - 47. [Abstract] [PDF]