This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Kaplan, B. J. Articles by Wilson, B. N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kaplan, B. J. Articles by Wilson, B. N. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Term Comorbidity Is of Questionable Value in Reference to Developmental Disorders

Data and Theory

Deborah M. Dewey

Susan G. Crawford

Brenda N. Wilson

Over the last decade, there has been an enormous increase in the number of studies evaluating the overlap of developmental syndromes or disorders in both children and adults. This overlap of symptoms is often referred to as comorbidity, a term we criticize in this article because of its unsubstantiated presumption of independent etiologies. The premise of this article is that discrete categories do not exist in real life, and that it is misleading to refer to overlapping categories or symptoms as "comorbidities." We illustrate our point by presenting data from 179 school-age children evaluated with rigorous research criteria for seven disorders: reading disability (RD), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), developmental coordination disorder (DCD), oppositional defiant disorder (ODD), conduct disorder (CD), depression, and anxiety. Fully 50% of this sample met the criteria for at least two diagnoses. The children with ADHD were at higher risk of having at least a second disorder compared to the children with RD. Overall, the high rates of overlap of these behavioral, emotional, and educational deficits in this broadly ascertained sample support the idea that the concept of comorbidity is inadequate. We discuss the concept of atypical brain development as an explanatory idea to interpret the high rate of overlap of developmental disorders.

Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 34, No. 6, 555-565 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/002221940103400608


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Schumacher, P. Hoffmann, C. Schmal, G. Schulte-Korne, and M. M Nothen Genetics of dyslexia: the evolving landscape J. Med. Genet., May 1, 2007; 44(5): 289 - 297. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Salmon, H. Cleave, and C. Samuel Development of Multi-agency Referral Pathways for Attention-deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, Developmental Coordination Disorder and Autistic Spectrum Disorders: Reflections on the Process and Suggestions for New Ways of Working Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, January 1, 2006; 11(1): 63 - 81. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Kooistra, S. Crawford, D. Dewey, M. Cantell, and B. J. Kaplan Motor Correlates of ADHD: Contribution of Reading Disability and Oppositional Defiant Disorder J Learn Disabil, June 1, 2005; 38(3): 195 - 206. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. B. Fleming, T. W. Harachi, R. C. Cortes, R. D. Abbott, and R. F. Catalano Level and Change in Reading Scores and Attention Problems During Elementary School as Predictors of Problem Behavior in Middle School Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, January 1, 2004; 12(3): 130 - 144. [Abstract] [PDF]