Journal of Learning Disabilities

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mariage, T. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mariage, T. V.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 34, No. 2, 172-196 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/002221940103400206

Features of an Interactive Writing Discourse: Conversational Involvement, Conventional Knowledge, and Internalization in "Morning Message"

Troy V. Mariage

333 Erickson Hall, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1034

This study describes how meaning potentials were constructed in the literacy event known as Morning Message. Morning Message provided teachers and students with opportunities to construct a written text around the experiences of one student. This discourse of writing allowed for the examination of how meaning was orchestrated and scaffolded between the teacher and her students. Three findings are discussed, including the function of a series of conversational involvement moves utilized by the teacher, the specific writing conventions and metamessages afforded in the Morning Message dialogue, and an examination of how the social dialogues of Morning Message may have come to guide independent action as internalized processes on several transfer measures.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Deaf Stud Deaf EducHome page
K. A. Wolbers
Using Balanced and Interactive Writing Instruction to Improve the Higher Order and Lower Order Writing Skills of Deaf Students
J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., April 1, 2008; 13(2): 257 - 277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Learn DisabilHome page
C. M. Okolo, R. P. Ferretti, and C. A. MacArthur
Talking About History: Discussions in a Middle School Inclusive Classroom
J Learn Disabil, April 1, 2007; 40(2): 154 - 165.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J Learn DisabilHome page
R. A. Wiebe Berry
Beyond Strategies: Teacher Beliefs and Writing Instruction in Two Primary Inclusion Classrooms
J Learn Disabil, February 1, 2006; 39(1): 11 - 24.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J Learn DisabilHome page
T. V. Mariage, D. J. Paxton-Buursma, and E. C. Bouck
Interanimation: Repositioning Possibilities in Educational Contexts
J Learn Disabil, December 1, 2004; 37(6): 534 - 549.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Remedial and Special EducationHome page
T. V. Mariage and M. A. Garmon
A Case of Educational Change: Improving Student Achievement Through a School University Partnership
Remedial and Special Education, August 1, 2003; 24(4): 215 - 234.
[Abstract] [PDF]