This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Limbos, M. M. Articles by Geva, E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Limbos, M. M. Articles by Geva, E. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Accuracy of Teacher Assessments of Second-Language Students at Risk for Reading Disability

University of Toronto,

Esther Geva

Department of Human Development and Applied Psychology at the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto, egeva@oise. utoronto.ca

This study examined the accuracy of teacher assessments in screening for reading disabilities among students of English as a second language (ESL) and as a first language (L1). Academic and oral language tests were administered to 369 children (249 ESL, 120 L1) at the beginning of Grade 1 and at the end of Grade 2. Concurrently, 51 teachers nominated children at risk for reading failure and completed rating scales assessing academic and oral language skills. Scholastic records were reviewed for notation of concern or referral. The criterion measure was a standardized reading score based on phonological awareness, rapid naming, and word recognition. Results indicated that teacher rating scales and nominations had low sensitivity in identifying ESL and L1 students at risk for reading disability at the 1-year mark. Relative to other forms of screening, teacher-expressed concern had lower sensitivity. Finally, oral language proficiency contributed to misclassifications in the ESL group.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?