Journal of Learning Disabilities

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gregg, N.
Right arrow Articles by Scott, S. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gregg, N.
Right arrow Articles by Scott, S. S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 33, No. 1, 5-13 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/002221940003300104

Definition and Documentation

Theory, Measurement, and the Courts

Noël Gregg

University of Georgia Learning Disabilities Center, 324 Milledge Hall, Athens, GA 30602

Sally S. Scott

University of Georgia Learning Disabilities Center, Department of Special Education

Definition of terms and the selection criteria for operationalizing the standard of disability are critical to accessing accommodations. The purpose of this article was to examine the research surrounding definitions and selection criteria for learning disabilities and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder at the postsecondary level. Implications from and for the courts follow a critical analysis of the professional literature. The need for researchers to utilize theory-based models to investigate the multivariate relationships between and within constructs underlying current definitions and eligibility criteria is also discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
S. C. Bowden, N. Gregg, D. Bandalos, M. Davis, C. Coleman, J. A. Holdnack, and L. G. Weiss
Latent Mean and Covariance Differences With Measurement Equivalence in College Students With Developmental Difficulties Versus the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III/Wechsler Memory Scale-III Normative Sample
Educational and Psychological Measurement, August 1, 2008; 68(4): 621 - 642.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J Learn DisabilHome page
P. A. McDermott, M. M. Goldberg, M. W. Watkins, J. L. Stanley, and J. J. Glutting
A Nationwide Epidemiologic Modeling Study of LD: Risk, Protection, and Unintended Impact
J Learn Disabil, June 1, 2006; 39(3): 230 - 251.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Assessment for Effective InterventionHome page
D. R. Parker and K. B. Benedict
Assessment and Intervention: Promoting Successful Transitions for College Students with ADHD
Assessment for Effective Intervention, January 1, 2002; 27(3): 3 - 24.
[Abstract] [PDF]