This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Stanovich, K. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Stanovich, K. E. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Learning Disorders Patient Safety Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Sociopsychometrics of Learning Disabilities

Department of Human Development and Applied Psychology, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto, 252 Bloor Street West, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 1V6

The Boston University (BU) case illustrates how the psychometrics of ability differences interact with the concept of learning disability and with the sodopolitics of schooling and society. It also illustrates that learning disabilities advocacy will not be on a sound footing as long as the field refuses to rid itself of its IQ fetishism, refuses to jettison its fixation on aptitude-achievement discrepancy, and fails to free clinical practice from the pseudoscientific neurology that plagued the field in the 1970s. A more inclusive definition of learning disability—one that abandons discrepancy notions-and a more self-critical attitude toward its own claims would advance the field of learning disabilities and help to rid it of distractions such as the BU case.

Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 32, No. 4, 350-361 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/002221949903200408


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. L. Sparks and B. J. Lovett College Students With Learning Disability Diagnoses: Who Are They and How Do They Perform? J Learn Disabil, November 1, 2009; 42(6): 494 - 510. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. E. Bolt and J. Ysseldyke Accommodating Students With Disabilities in Large-Scale Testing: A Comparison of Differential Item Functioning (DIF) Identified Across Disability Types Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, June 1, 2008; 26(2): 121 - 138. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. J. Lovett and L. J. Lewandowski Gifted Students With Learning Disabilities: Who Are They? J Learn Disabil, December 1, 2006; 39(6): 515 - 527. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. L. Sparks Is There a "Disability" for Learning a Foreign Language? J Learn Disabil, December 1, 2006; 39(6): 544 - 557. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. Hoeft, A. Hernandez, G. McMillon, H. Taylor-Hill, J. L. Martindale, A. Meyler, T. A. Keller, W. T. Siok, G. K. Deutsch, M. A. Just, et al. Neural Basis of Dyslexia: A Comparison between Dyslexic and Nondyslexic Children Equated for Reading Ability. J. Neurosci., October 18, 2006; 26(42): 10700 - 10708. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. Lipka, N. K. Lesaux, and L. S. Siegel Retrospective Analyses of the Reading Development of Grade 4 Students with Reading Disabilities: Risk Status and Profiles Over 5 Years J Learn Disabil, August 1, 2006; 39(4): 364 - 378. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. A. McDermott, M. M. Goldberg, M. W. Watkins, J. L. Stanley, and J. J. Glutting A Nationwide Epidemiologic Modeling Study of LD: Risk, Protection, and Unintended Impact J Learn Disabil, June 1, 2006; 39(3): 230 - 251. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Barrera Roles of Definitional and Assessment Models in the Identification of New or Second Language Learners of English for Special Education J Learn Disabil, April 1, 2006; 39(2): 142 - 156. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. D. Coyne, R. P. Zipoli JR, and M. F. Ruby Beginning Reading Instruction for Students at Risk for Reading Disabilities: What, How, and When Intervention in School and Clinic, January 1, 2006; 41(3): 161 - 168. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. S. Siegel and I. S. Smythe Reflections on Research on Reading Disability with Special Attention to Gender Issues J Learn Disabil, October 1, 2005; 38(5): 473 - 477. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Chiappe How Reading Research Can Inform Mathematics Difficulties: The Search for the Core Deficit J Learn Disabil, August 1, 2005; 38(4): 313 - 317. [PDF]

				M. D. Coyne, E. J. Kame'enui, and D. C. Simmons Improving Beginning Reading Instruction and Intervention for Students with LD: Reconciling "All" with "Each" J Learn Disabil, June 1, 2004; 37(3): 231 - 239. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. H. Kroesbergen, J. E. H. Van Luit, and J. A. Naglieri Mathematical Learning Difficulties and PASS Cognitive Processes J Learn Disabil, December 1, 2003; 36(6): 574 - 582. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Proctor and F. Prevatt Agreement Among Four Models Used for Diagnosing Learning Disabilities J Learn Disabil, October 1, 2003; 36(5): 459 - 466. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. D'Angiulli and L. S. Siegel Cognitive Functioning as Measured by the WISC-R: Do Children with Learning Disabilities Have Distinctive Patterns of Performance? J Learn Disabil, February 1, 2003; 36(1): 48 - 58. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. L. Sparks, L. G. Philips, and J. Javorsky Students Classified as LD Who Received Course Substitutions for the College Foreign Language Requirement: A Replication Study J Learn Disabil, December 1, 2002; 35(6): 482 - 500. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. D. Warner, D. E. Dede, C. W. Garvan, and T. W. Conway One Size Still Does Not Fit All in Specific Learning Disability Assessment Across Ethnic Groups J Learn Disabil, December 1, 2002; 35(6): 501 - 509. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. Van den Broeck The Misconception of the Regression-Based Discrepancy Operationalization in the Definition and Research of Learning Disabilities J Learn Disabil, May 1, 2002; 35(3): 194 - 204. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. W. Watkins, J. C. Kush, and B. A. Schaefer Diagnostic Utility of the Learning Disability Index J Learn Disabil, March 1, 2002; 35(2): 98 - 103. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. J. Fawcett, R. I. Nicolson, and F. Maclagan Cerebellar Tests Differentiate Between Groups of Poor Readers With and Without IQ Discrepancy J Learn Disabil, March 1, 2001; 34(2): 119 - 135. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. M. Limbos and E. Geva Accuracy of Teacher Assessments of Second-Language Students at Risk for Reading Disability J Learn Disabil, March 1, 2001; 34(2): 136 - 151. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Gordon, L. Lewandowski, and S. Keiser The LD Label for Relatively Well-Functioning Students: A Critical Analysis J Learn Disabil, November 1, 1999; 32(6): 485 - 490. [Abstract] [PDF]