Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Learning Disabilities
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stanovich, K. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stanovich, K. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Sociopsychometrics of Learning Disabilities

Keith E. Stanovich

Department of Human Development and Applied Psychology, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto, 252 Bloor Street West, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 1V6

The Boston University (BU) case illustrates how the psychometrics of ability differences interact with the concept of learning disability and with the sodopolitics of schooling and society. It also illustrates that learning disabilities advocacy will not be on a sound footing as long as the field refuses to rid itself of its IQ fetishism, refuses to jettison its fixation on aptitude-achievement discrepancy, and fails to free clinical practice from the pseudoscientific neurology that plagued the field in the 1970s. A more inclusive definition of learning disability—one that abandons discrepancy notions-and a more self-critical attitude toward its own claims would advance the field of learning disabilities and help to rid it of distractions such as the BU case.

Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 32, No. 4, 350-361 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/002221949903200408


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
R. L. Sparks and B. J. Lovett
College Students With Learning Disability Diagnoses: Who Are They and How Do They Perform?
J Learn Disabil, November 1, 2009; 42(6): 494 - 510.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentHome page
S. E. Bolt and J. Ysseldyke
Accommodating Students With Disabilities in Large-Scale Testing: A Comparison of Differential Item Functioning (DIF) Identified Across Disability Types
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, June 1, 2008; 26(2): 121 - 138.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
B. J. Lovett and L. J. Lewandowski
Gifted Students With Learning Disabilities: Who Are They?
J Learn Disabil, December 1, 2006; 39(6): 515 - 527.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
R. L. Sparks
Is There a "Disability" for Learning a Foreign Language?
J Learn Disabil, December 1, 2006; 39(6): 544 - 557.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
F. Hoeft, A. Hernandez, G. McMillon, H. Taylor-Hill, J. L. Martindale, A. Meyler, T. A. Keller, W. T. Siok, G. K. Deutsch, M. A. Just, et al.
Neural Basis of Dyslexia: A Comparison between Dyslexic and Nondyslexic Children Equated for Reading Ability.
J. Neurosci., October 18, 2006; 26(42): 10700 - 10708.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
O. Lipka, N. K. Lesaux, and L. S. Siegel
Retrospective Analyses of the Reading Development of Grade 4 Students with Reading Disabilities: Risk Status and Profiles Over 5 Years
J Learn Disabil, August 1, 2006; 39(4): 364 - 378.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
P. A. McDermott, M. M. Goldberg, M. W. Watkins, J. L. Stanley, and J. J. Glutting
A Nationwide Epidemiologic Modeling Study of LD: Risk, Protection, and Unintended Impact
J Learn Disabil, June 1, 2006; 39(3): 230 - 251.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
M. Barrera
Roles of Definitional and Assessment Models in the Identification of New or Second Language Learners of English for Special Education
J Learn Disabil, April 1, 2006; 39(2): 142 - 156.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Intervention in School and ClinicHome page
M. D. Coyne, R. P. Zipoli JR, and M. F. Ruby
Beginning Reading Instruction for Students at Risk for Reading Disabilities: What, How, and When
Intervention in School and Clinic, January 1, 2006; 41(3): 161 - 168.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
L. S. Siegel and I. S. Smythe
Reflections on Research on Reading Disability with Special Attention to Gender Issues
J Learn Disabil, October 1, 2005; 38(5): 473 - 477.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
P. Chiappe
How Reading Research Can Inform Mathematics Difficulties: The Search for the Core Deficit
J Learn Disabil, August 1, 2005; 38(4): 313 - 317.
[PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
M. D. Coyne, E. J. Kame'enui, and D. C. Simmons
Improving Beginning Reading Instruction and Intervention for Students with LD: Reconciling "All" with "Each"
J Learn Disabil, June 1, 2004; 37(3): 231 - 239.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
E. H. Kroesbergen, J. E. H. Van Luit, and J. A. Naglieri
Mathematical Learning Difficulties and PASS Cognitive Processes
J Learn Disabil, December 1, 2003; 36(6): 574 - 582.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
B. Proctor and F. Prevatt
Agreement Among Four Models Used for Diagnosing Learning Disabilities
J Learn Disabil, October 1, 2003; 36(5): 459 - 466.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
A. D'Angiulli and L. S. Siegel
Cognitive Functioning as Measured by the WISC-R: Do Children with Learning Disabilities Have Distinctive Patterns of Performance?
J Learn Disabil, February 1, 2003; 36(1): 48 - 58.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
R. L. Sparks, L. G. Philips, and J. Javorsky
Students Classified as LD Who Received Course Substitutions for the College Foreign Language Requirement: A Replication Study
J Learn Disabil, December 1, 2002; 35(6): 482 - 500.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
T. D. Warner, D. E. Dede, C. W. Garvan, and T. W. Conway
One Size Still Does Not Fit All in Specific Learning Disability Assessment Across Ethnic Groups
J Learn Disabil, December 1, 2002; 35(6): 501 - 509.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
W. Van den Broeck
The Misconception of the Regression-Based Discrepancy Operationalization in the Definition and Research of Learning Disabilities
J Learn Disabil, May 1, 2002; 35(3): 194 - 204.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
M. W. Watkins, J. C. Kush, and B. A. Schaefer
Diagnostic Utility of the Learning Disability Index
J Learn Disabil, March 1, 2002; 35(2): 98 - 103.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
A. J. Fawcett, R. I. Nicolson, and F. Maclagan
Cerebellar Tests Differentiate Between Groups of Poor Readers With and Without IQ Discrepancy
J Learn Disabil, March 1, 2001; 34(2): 119 - 135.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
M. M. Limbos and E. Geva
Accuracy of Teacher Assessments of Second-Language Students at Risk for Reading Disability
J Learn Disabil, March 1, 2001; 34(2): 136 - 151.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
M. Gordon, L. Lewandowski, and S. Keiser
The LD Label for Relatively Well-Functioning Students: A Critical Analysis
J Learn Disabil, November 1, 1999; 32(6): 485 - 490.
[Abstract] [PDF]