Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Learning Disabilities
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ward-Lonergan, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ward-Lonergan, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, A. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Verbal Retelling Abilities in Adolescents With and Without Language-Learning Disabilities for Social Studies Lectures

Jeannene M. Ward-Lonergan

Department of Communication Disorders at Bowling Green State Unicersity in Ohio

Betty Z. Liles

Department of Communication Sciences at the University of Connecticut

Angela M. Anderson

Rainbow Rehabilitation Services in Ypsilanti Township, Michigan

Verbal retelling abilities for social studies lectures were examined and compared in 20 adolescent boys, ages 12-5 to 14-7, with language-learning disabilities (LLD) and 29 with normal language abilities (NL). Participants viewed one videotaped social studies lecture with a comparison expository discourse structure and one with a causation discourse structure. Following each lecture presentation, participants verbally retold the lecture. Results of several repeated-measures analyses of variance indicated that the group with LLD produced a significantly smaller number of T-units, subordinate clauses, subordinate clauses per T-unit, T-units per second, lecture components per second, and percentage of lecture components in their retellings, compared with the group with NL, regardless of lecture type. Both groups produced a significantly greater number of T-units and subordinate clauses for the comparison lecture. By contrast, both groups recalled a significantly greater number of lecture components per T-unit and per second for the causation lecture. Results indicated that the comparison discourse structure facilitated more substantive and elaborate retellings, whereas the causation discourse structure facilitated more efficient, concise retellings in both groups. Research and instructional implications are discussed.

Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 32, No. 3, 213-223 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/002221949903200303


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AJSLPHome page
M. A. Nippold, T. C. Mansfield, J. L. Billow, and J. B. Tomblin
Syntactic Development in Adolescents With a History of Language Impairments: A Follow-Up Investigation
Am J Speech Lang Pathol, August 1, 2009; 18(3): 241 - 251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJSLPHome page
M. A. Nippold, T. C. Mansfield, J. L. Billow, and J. B. Tomblin
Expository Discourse in Adolescents With Language Impairments: Examining Syntactic Development
Am J Speech Lang Pathol, November 1, 2008; 17(4): 356 - 366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]