Journal of Learning Disabilities

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ganschow, L.
Right arrow Articles by Antonoff, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ganschow, L.
Right arrow Articles by Antonoff, S. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 32, No. 1, 72-84 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/002221949903200107

A 10-Year Follow-Up Survey of Programs and Services for Students with Learning Disabilities in Graduate and Professional Schools

Leonore Ganschow

Department of Educational Psychology at Miami University of Oxford, Ohio

Jennifer Coyne

Department of Educational Psychology at the University of Iowa at Iowa City

Allen W. Parks

Triage/Resource Center, Nashua Behavioral Health System, Nashua, New Hampshire

Stanley J. Antonoff

Division of Restorative and Prosthodontic Sciences and director of the Learning Disability program at New York University College of Dentistry

This 10-year follow-up study compares programs and services for students with learning disabilities (LD) in graduate and professional schools between 1985 and 1995. In 1995, surveys were sent to the same institutions (n = 682) as in the earlier survey, with a response rate of 30.6%. Significant changes over the 10 years include a higher level of awareness about LD and evidence of greater compliance with Section 504, a greater specificity of assessments required for the identification of students who receive services, improvements in the types and extent of services available, and increased program visibility. Despite these positive changes, 24% of the respondents indicated that they did not have a coordinator for LD at their institution, and 33% did not have a written plan for services. Eighteen institutions with programs or services for students with LD gave permission to publish their names. Implications and recommendations are discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Special EducationHome page
C. A. Mull and P. L. Sitlington
The Role of Technology in the Transition to Postsecondary Education of Students with Learning Disabilities: A Review of the Literature
Journal of Special Education, May 1, 2003; 37(1): 26 - 32.
[Abstract] [PDF]