Journal of Learning Disabilities

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gumpel, T.
Right arrow Articles by Shalev, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gumpel, T.
Right arrow Articles by Shalev, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 31, No. 6, 525-532 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/002221949803100602

An Item Response Theory Analysis of the Conners Teacher's Rating Scale

Thomas Gumpel

Thomas Gumpel is an assistant professor and is currently at the Department of Special Education at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. His research interests include social skills training and sociometric status, school violence, item response theory modeling, and international comparative policy analysis in special education.

Mark Wilson

Mark Wilson is a professor of education at the University of California-Berkely. He specializes in educational and psychological measurement and educational statistics.

Ruth Shalev

Ruth Shalev is a pediatric neurologist with research interests in developmental cognitive disorders, particularly development dyscalculia. Address: Thomas Gumpel, Department of Special Education, School of Education, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel 91905 (e-mail: tgumpel@vms.huji.ac.il).

We used an item response theory (IRT) measurement model to examine the 28–item Conners Teacher's Rating Scale (CTRS) for the diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Using an Israeli sample of 453 pairs of respondents (parents and teachers), we broke down our sample into nonclinical (n = 306) and clinical (n = 147) subsamples. IRT analyses based on a rating scale model revealed structural inadequacies involving the apparent inappropriateness of the 4-point Likert-type scale used by the CTRS. Additionally, IRT analyses were able to shed light on differences in the structure of the latent trait for the ADHD variable as measured by the CTRS for all four groups of respondents. Implications for the diagnosis and treatment of ADHD are presented.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Atten DisordHome page
R. Gomez
Australian Parent and Teacher Ratings of the DSM-IV ADHD Symptoms: Differential Symptom Functioning and Parent-Teacher Agreement and Differences
J Atten Disord, July 1, 2007; 11(1): 17 - 27.
[Abstract] [PDF]