|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Achieving Meaningful Mathematics Literacy for Students with Learning Disabilities
Susan R. Goldman
Susan R. Goldman, PhD, The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt is a professor of psychology and co-director of the Learning Technology Center, Peabody College, Vanderbilt University.
Ted S. Hasselbring
Ted S. Hasselbring, PhD, The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt is a professor of special education and co-director of the Learning Technology Center. The work both Goldman and Hasselbring is focused on the role technology plays in developing deep understanding in literacy and mathematics. Their past research has focused on the development of fluent skills and the relationship of fluency to higher order thinking and problem solving. Address: Susan R. Goldman, Learning Technology, Center, Box 45 Peabody, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203. GoldmanS@Ctrvax.Vanderbilt.edu.
In this article we consider issues relevant to the future of mathematics instruction and achievement for students with learning disabilities. The starting point for envisioning the future is the changing standards for mathematics learning and basic mathematical literacy. We argue that the shift from behaviorist learning theories to constructivist and social constructivist theories (see Rivera, this series) provides an opportunity to develop and implement a hybrid model of mathematics instruction. The hybrid model we propose embeds, or situates, important skill learning in meaningful contexts. We discuss some examples of instructional approaches to complex mathematical problem solving that make use of meaningful contexts. Evaluation data on these approaches have yielded positive and encouraging results for students with learning disabilities as well as general education students. Finally, we discuss various ways in which technology is important for realizing hybrid instructional models in mathematics.
Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 30, No. 2,
198-208 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/002221949703000207

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Mayrowetz
Instructional Practice in the Context of Converging Policies: Teaching Mathematics in Inclusive Elementary Classrooms in the Standards Reform Era
Educational Policy,
July 1, 2009;
23(4):
554 - 588.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Yan Ping Xin, A. K. Jitendra, and A. Deatline-Buchman
Effects of Mathematical Word Problem Solving Instruction on Middle School Students with Learning Problems
Journal of Special Education,
November 1, 2005;
39(3):
181 - 192.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. K. Jitendra, A. Deatline-Buchman, and E. Sczesniak
A Comparative Analysis of Third-Grade Mathematics Textbooks Before and After the 2000 NCTM Standards
Assessment for Effective Intervention,
January 1, 2005;
30(2):
47 - 62.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Woodward
Mathematics Education in the United States: Past to Present
J Learn Disabil,
February 1, 2004;
37(1):
16 - 31.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. L. Owen and L. S. Fuchs
Mathematical Problem-Solving Strategy Instruction for Third-Grade Students with Learning Disabilities
Remedial and Special Education,
October 1, 2002;
23(5):
268 - 278.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Jitendra, C. M. DiPipi, and N. Perron-Jones
An Exploratory Study of Schema-Based Word-Problem Solving Instruction for Middle School Students with Learning Disabilities: An Emphasis on Conceptual and Procedural Understanding
Journal of Special Education,
May 1, 2002;
36(1):
23 - 38.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. A. Bottge, M. Heinrichs, Zara Dee Mehta, and Y.-H. Hung
Weighing the Benefits of Anchored Math Instruction for Students with Disabilities in General Education Classes
Journal of Special Education,
January 1, 2002;
35(4):
186 - 200.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. A. Bottge
Reconceptualizing Mathematics Problem Solving for Low-Achieving Students
Remedial and Special Education,
March 1, 2001;
22(2):
102 - 112.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|