|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Instructional Design in Mathematics for Students with Learning Disabilities
Douglas Carnine
Douglas Carnine, PhD, is currently a professor in the College of Education at the University of Oregon and director of the National Center to Improve the Tools of Educators. His research interests include policy for educational improvement, knowledge utilization, and curriculum design. Address: Douglas Carnine, National Center to Improve the Tools of Educators, University of Oregon, 805 Lincoln St., Eugene, OR 97401.
The low achievement level of students with learning disabilities has multiple causes. One is the mismatch between the students' learning characteristics and the design of instructional materials and practices. Design principles better suited to the characteristics of students with learning disabilities are described and illustrated for five areas: (a) big ideas; (b) conspicuous strategies; (c) efficient use of time; (d) clear, explicit instruction on strategies; and (e) appropriate practice and review. Wider application of these design principles, in instructional material and in actual teaching, could contribute to far higher achievement levels in mathematics for students with learning disabilities.
Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 30, No. 2,
130-141 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/002221949703000201

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Mayrowetz
Instructional Practice in the Context of Converging Policies: Teaching Mathematics in Inclusive Elementary Classrooms in the Standards Reform Era
Educational Policy,
July 1, 2009;
23(4):
554 - 588.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Sood and A. K. Jitendra
A Comparative Analysis of Number Sense Instruction in Reform-Based and Traditional Mathematics Textbooks
Journal of Special Education,
November 1, 2007;
41(3):
145 - 157.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. S. Fuchs and D. Fuchs
Enhancing Mathematical Problem Solving for Students with Disabilities
Journal of Special Education,
May 1, 2005;
39(1):
45 - 57.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. J. Paulsen
Infusing Evidence-Based Practices into the Special Education Preparation Curriculum
Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children,
January 1, 2005;
28(1):
21 - 28.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Woodward
Mathematics Education in the United States: Past to Present
J Learn Disabil,
February 1, 2004;
37(1):
16 - 31.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. E. van Kraayenoord and J. Elkins
Learning Difficulties in Numeracy in Australia
J Learn Disabil,
February 1, 2004;
37(1):
32 - 41.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. H. Kroesbergen and J. E.H. Van Luit
Mathematics Interventions for Children with Special Educational Needs: A Meta-Analysis
Remedial and Special Education,
April 1, 2003;
24(2):
97 - 114.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. L. Owen and L. S. Fuchs
Mathematical Problem-Solving Strategy Instruction for Third-Grade Students with Learning Disabilities
Remedial and Special Education,
October 1, 2002;
23(5):
268 - 278.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. A. Bottge
Reconceptualizing Mathematics Problem Solving for Low-Achieving Students
Remedial and Special Education,
March 1, 2001;
22(2):
102 - 112.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Gersten and D. Chard
Number Sense: Rethinking Arithmetic Instruction for Students with Mathematical Disabilities
Journal of Special Education,
April 1, 1999;
33(1):
18 - 28.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|