Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Learning Disabilities
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clark, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clark, M. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Teacher Response to Learning Disability

A Test of Attributional Principles

Margaret D. Clark

Margaret D. Clark, MA, is an adjunct professor at California State University, Los Angeles, in the Division of Special Education. She is currently a doctoral candidate in the California State University, Los Angeles/ University of California, Los Angeles, Joint Doctoral Program. Her research interests include general education teachers' perception and concepualization of learning disabilities, and the attributional approach to achievement motivation. Address: Margaret D. Clark, Division of Special Education, California State University-Los Angeles, 5151 State University Dr. KH C-1071, Los Angeles, CA 90032–8144.

Attribution research has identified student ability and effort expended as causes of achievement outcomes that result in differing teacher affect, evaluative feedback, and expectation of future performance. Ninety-seven elementary-school general education teachers (84 women and 13 men) rated their responses to the test failures of hypothetical boys with and without learning disabilities. In most cases, greater reward and less punishment, less anger and more pity, and higher expectations of future failure followed the negative outcomes of the boys with learning disabilities, when compared with their nondisabled ability and effort matches, indicating that learning disability acts as a cause of achievement outcomes in the same way as ability and effort. This pattern of teacher affect and response can send negative messages that are often interpreted as low-ability cues, thus affecting students' self-esteem, sense of competence as learners, and motivation to achieve.

Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 30, No. 1, 69-79 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/002221949703000106


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
D. Paterson
Teachers' In-Flight Thinking in Inclusive Classrooms
J Learn Disabil, October 1, 2007; 40(5): 427 - 435.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional ChildrenHome page
D. M. Podell and N. Tournaki
General and Special Educators' Predictions of Student Success as a Function of Learner Characteristics and Teacher Experience
Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, January 1, 2007; 30(4): 249 - 263.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
B. A. Ferri, C. H. Keefe, and N. Gregg
Teachers with Learning Disabilities: A View From Both Sides of the Desk
J Learn Disabil, January 1, 2001; 34(1): 22 - 32.
[Abstract] [PDF]