Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Learning Disabilities
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Montague, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Montague, M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Learning Disorders
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Effects of Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategy Instruction on the Mathematical Problem Solving of Middle School Students with Learning Disabilities

Marjorie Montague

Marjorie Montague received her PhD from the University of Arizona in 1984. She is an associate professor in the School of Education at the University of Miami. Address: Marjorie Montague, School of Education, University of Miami, PO Box 248065, Coral Gables, FL 33124.

This study investigated the effects of cognitive and metacognitive strategy instruction on the mathematical problem solving of six middle school students with learning disabilities. Conditions of the multiple baseline, across-subjects design included baseline, two levels of treatment, setting and temporal generalization, and retraining. For Treatment 1, subjects received either cognitive or metacognitive strategy instruction. Treatment 2 consisted of instruction in the complementary component of the instructional program so that all subjects eventually received both cognitive and metacognitive strategy instruction. This design allowed a componential analysis of the content as well as sequence of instruction. Generally, subjects improved their mathematical problem solving as measured by performance on one-, two-, and three-step word problems. Discussion focused on effectiveness of treatment, acquisition and application of strategic knowledge, error pattern analysis, and the need to tailor instruction to the learner's individual characteristics.

Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 25, No. 4, 230-248 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/002221949202500404


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
D. van Garderen
Teaching Students With LD to Use Diagrams to Solve Mathematical Word Problems
J Learn Disabil, December 1, 2007; 40(6): 540 - 553.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Special EducationHome page
Yan Ping Xin, A. K. Jitendra, and A. Deatline-Buchman
Effects of Mathematical Word Problem Solving Instruction on Middle School Students with Learning Problems
Journal of Special Education, November 1, 2005; 39(3): 181 - 192.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
J. Woodward
Mathematics Education in the United States: Past to Present
J Learn Disabil, February 1, 2004; 37(1): 16 - 31.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Intervention in School and ClinicHome page
M. A. Gallagher Landi
Helping Students with Learning Disabilities Make Sense of Word Problems
Intervention in School and Clinic, September 1, 2001; 37(1): 13 - 18.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
A. Desoete, H. Roeyers, and A. Buysse
Metacognition and Mathematical Problem Solving in Grade 3
J Learn Disabil, September 1, 2001; 34(5): 435 - 447.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Remedial and Special EducationHome page
B. A. Bottge
Reconceptualizing Mathematics Problem Solving for Low-Achieving Students
Remedial and Special Education, March 1, 2001; 22(2): 102 - 112.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Special EducationHome page
B. A. Bottge
Effects of Contextualized Math Instruction on Problem Solving of Average and Below-Average Achieving Students
Journal of Special Education, July 1, 1999; 33(2): 81 - 92.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Remedial and Special EducationHome page
A. K. Jitendra, K. Hoff, and M. M. Beck
Teaching Middle School Students with Learning Disabilities to Solve Word Problems Using a Schema-Based Approach
Remedial and Special Education, January 1, 1999; 20(1): 50 - 64.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Special EducationHome page
Yan Ping Xin and A. K. Jitendra
The Effects of Instruction in Solving Mathematical Word Problems for Students with Learning Problems: A Meta-Analysis
Journal of Special Education, January 1, 1999; 32(4): 207 - 225.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
E. D. Jones, R. Wilson, and S. Bhojwani
Mathematics Instruction for Secondary Students with Learning Disabilities
J Learn Disabil, March 1, 1997; 30(2): 151 - 163.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
M. Montague
Cognitive Strategy Instruction in Mathematics for Students with Learning Disabilities
J Learn Disabil, March 1, 1997; 30(2): 164 - 177.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
D. P. Rivera
Mathematics Education and Students with Learning Disabilities: Introduction to the Special Series
J Learn Disabil, January 1, 1997; 30(1): 2 - 19.
[PDF]


Home page
Remedial and Special EducationHome page
M. Montague
Student Perception, Mathematical Problem Solving, and Learning Disabilities
Remedial and Special Education, January 1, 1997; 18(1): 46 - 53.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Special EducationHome page
A. Jitendra and Y. P. Xin
Mathematical Word-Problem-Solving Instruction for Students with Mild Disabilities and Students at Risk for Math Failure: A Research Synthesis
Journal of Special Education, January 1, 1997; 30(4): 412 - 438.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Special EducationHome page
C. D. Mercer, L. Jordan, and S. P. Miller
Implications of Constructivism for Teaching Math to Students with Moderate to Mild Disabilities
Journal of Special Education, January 1, 1994; 28(3): 290 - 306.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Special EducationHome page
M. Montague and B. Applegate
Mathematical Problem-Solving Characteristics of Middle School Students With Learning Disabilities
Journal of Special Education, January 1, 1993; 27(2): 175 - 201.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Assessment for Effective InterventionHome page
R. S. Parmar
Protocol Analysis of Strategies Used By Students with Mild Disabilities when Solving Arithmetic Word Problems
Assessment for Effective Intervention, January 1, 1992; 17(4): 227 - 243.
[Abstract] [PDF]