|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Discrepancy Compared to Low Achievement Definitions of Reading DisabilityResults from the Connecticut Longitudinal Study
Bennett A. Shaywitz
Bennett A. Shaywitz, MD, is professor of pediatrics, neurology, and child study at the Yale University School of Medicine and codirector of the Yale Center for the Study of Learning and Attention Disorders. His principal research interests focus on neurobiological influences in learning and attention disorders.
Jack M. Fletcher
Jack M. Fletcher, PhD, is professor of pediatrics and chief of the section of developmental pediatrics at the University of Texas School of Medicine at Houston. He is a diplomate of the American Board of Clinical Neuropsychology. His principal research areas are concerned with the classification of neurobehavioral disorders of childhood and with recovery of function in children with brain injury.
John M. Holahan
John M. Holahan, PhD, is director of data management at the Yale Center for the Study of Learning and Attention Disorders. His research interests include measurement and evaluation, research design and applied statistical analysis, early childhood and music education, and the psychology of music.
Sally E. Shaywitz
Sally E. Shaywitz, MD, is professor of pediatrics and child study at the Yale University School of Medicine and codirector of the Yale Center for the Study of Learning and Attention Disorders. Dr. Shaywitz's major research interests center on epidemiological and longitudinal issues in learning and attention disorders. Address: Bennett A. Shaywitz, MD, Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, PO Box 3333, New Haven, CT 06510--8064.
We used data derived from a survey sample, the Connecticut Longitudinal Study (CLS), to compare two commonly employed definitions of reading disability: a discrepancy-based model (D) and a low reading achievement model (L). We identified children satisfying each definition in second grade and compared the groups retrospectively in kindergarten and prospectively in fifth grade using parent-based, teacher-based, and child-based measures. Our findings suggest more similarities than differences between the reading disabled groups. The most salient differences were those related to ability and seem inherent in the definitions of the groups: Children identified as D have significantly higher verbal, performance, and full scale IQ scores than those identified as L. These findings suggest that both groups of children with reading disability, that is, those defined by either D or L, should be considered eligible for special education services.
Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 25, No. 10,
639-648 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/002221949202501003

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Ferrer, B. A. Shaywitz, J. M. Holahan, K. Marchione, and S. E. Shaywitz
Uncoupling of Reading and IQ Over Time: Empirical Evidence for a Definition of Dyslexia
Psychological Science,
January 1, 2010;
21(1):
93 - 101.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Xiangdong Yang, J. Shaftel, D. Glasnapp, and J. Poggio
Qualitative or Quantitative Differences?: Latent Class Analysis of Mathematical Ability for Special Education Students
Journal of Special Education,
February 1, 2005;
38(4):
194 - 207.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Proctor and F. Prevatt
Agreement Among Four Models Used for Diagnosing Learning Disabilities
J Learn Disabil,
October 1, 2003;
36(5):
459 - 466.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. P. Waber, M. D. Weiler, P. W. Forbes, J. H. Bernstein, D. C. Bellinger, and L. Rappaport
Neurobehavioral Factors Associated with Referral for Learning Problems in a Community Sample: Evidence for an Adaptational Model for Learning Disorders
J Learn Disabil,
October 1, 2003;
36(5):
467 - 483.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. A. Stage, R. D. Abbott, J. R. Jenkins, and V. W. Berninger
Predicting Response to Early Reading Intervention From Verbal IQ, Reading-Related Language Abilities, Attention Ratings, and Verbal IQ Word Reading Discrepancy: Failure to Validate Discrepancy Method
J Learn Disabil,
February 1, 2003;
36(1):
24 - 33.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. D. Warner, D. E. Dede, C. W. Garvan, and T. W. Conway
One Size Still Does Not Fit All in Specific Learning Disability Assessment Across Ethnic Groups
J Learn Disabil,
December 1, 2002;
35(6):
501 - 509.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Van den Broeck
The Misconception of the Regression-Based Discrepancy Operationalization in the Definition and Research of Learning Disabilities
J Learn Disabil,
May 1, 2002;
35(3):
194 - 204.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. A. Sofie and C. A. Riccio
A Comparison of Multiple Methods for the Identification of Children with Reading Disabilities
J Learn Disabil,
May 1, 2002;
35(3):
234 - 244.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Pisecco, D. B. Baker, P. A. Silva, and M. Brooke
Boys with Reading Disabilities and/or ADHD: Distinctions in Early Childhood
J Learn Disabil,
March 1, 2001;
34(2):
98 - 106.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. E. Morgan, N. Singer-Harris, J. H. Bernstein, and D. P. Waber
Characteristics of Children Referred for Evaluation of School Difficulties Who Have Adequate Academic Achievement Scores
J Learn Disabil,
September 1, 2000;
33(5):
489 - 500.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. A. Kavale and S. R. Forness
What Definitions of Learning Disability Say and Don't Say: A Critical Analysis
J Learn Disabil,
May 1, 2000;
33(3):
239 - 256.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. H. Silver, H. Deborah-Lynne Pennett, J. L. Black, G. W. Fair, and R. R. Balise
Stability of Arithmetic Disability Subtypes
J Learn Disabil,
March 1, 1999;
32(2):
108 - 119.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. E. Spagna
Dyslexia Marker Variables: Reviving a System for Reporting Sample Characteristics in Learning Disabilities Research
Remedial and Special Education,
September 1, 1998;
19(5):
291 - 299.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. L. MacMillan, F. M. Gresham, and K. M. Bocian
Discrepancy Between Definitions of Learning Disabilities and School Practices: An Empirical Investigation
J Learn Disabil,
July 1, 1998;
31(4):
314 - 326.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. M. Gresham, D. L. MacMillan, and K. M. Bocian
Learning Disabilities, Low Achievement, and Mild Mental Retardation: More Alike Than Different?
J Learn Disabil,
November 1, 1996;
29(6):
570 - 581.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. A. Badian
Dyslexia: A Validation of the Concept at Two Age Levels
J Learn Disabil,
January 1, 1996;
29(1):
102 - 112.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. F. Eden, J. F. Stein, M. H. Wood, and F. B. Wood
Verbal and Visual Problems in Reading Disability
J Learn Disabil,
May 1, 1995;
28(5):
272 - 290.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. J. Schuerholz, E. L. Harris, T. L. Baumgardner, A. L. Reiss, L. S. Freund, R. P. Church, J. Mohr, and M. B. Denckla
An Analysis of Two Discrepancy-based Models and a Processing-Deficit Approach in Identifying Learning Disabilities
J Learn Disabil,
January 1, 1995;
28(1):
18 - 29.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|