Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Learning Disabilities
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dixon, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dixon, R. C.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Learning Disorders
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Application of Sameness Analysis to Spelling

Robert C. Dixon, MA

Robert C. Dixon, MA, is the senior author of the Direct Instruction spelling programs published by Science Research Associates. He is a language arts project coordinator for the Washington Research Institute in Seattle. Address: Robert C. Dixon, 2716 Hillside Dr. SE, Olympia, WA 98501.

Three curricular approaches to spelling instruction are discussed: (1) whole word, (2) phonemic, and (3) morphemic. Sameness analysis is used to indicate the theoretical potential of each approach for helping students with learning disabilities to achieve generalization in their spelling. The influence of generalization upon retention and transfer is also discussed. In light of weak empirical evidence to support these approaches, it is recommended that promising instructional programs be piloted prior to adoption. Some cautious practical recommendations are offered for analytically evaluating spelling programs under consideration for piloting.

Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 24, No. 5, 285-291 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/002221949102400505
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?