Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Learning Disabilities
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aaron, P. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aaron, P. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Can Reading Disabilities Be Diagnosed Without Using Intelligence Tests?

P. G. Aaron

P.G. Aaron received his PhD from the University of Wisconsin and is currently professor of educational and school psychology at Indiana State University. His published works include the recently published book, Dyslexia and Hyperlexia: Diagnosis and Management of Developmental Reading Disabilities. Address: P.G. Aaron, Department of Educational and School Psychology, Indiana State University, Terre Haute, IN 47809.

Unlike conventional procedures, which use IQ in making diagnostic and eligibility decisions regarding learning disabilities, this demonstration study used listening comprehension and other reading-related tasks to make a differential diagnosis of reading disabilities. Tests of listening and reading comprehension were administered to 180 children from Grades 3 through 8. A regression equation was then derived to predict reading comprehension from listening comprehension. The regression equation was applied to the listening comprehension scores of seven children from Grades 3 to 8 who had reading difficulties, and their reading comprehension was predicted. Based on the discrepancy between their actual reading comprehension and the predicted reading comprehension, their reading difficulty was attributed to one of the following three factors: (a) poor decoding, (b) poor comprehension, or (c) a combination of poor decoding and poor comprehension. The validity of these diagnostic decisions was assessed by testing independently these children's word-decoding skill and reading speed. The results suggest that this diagnostic procedure has potential utility.

Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 24, No. 3, 178-186 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/002221949102400306


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
A. van der Leij and E. Morfidi
Core Deficits and Variable Differences in Dutch Poor Readers Learning English
J Learn Disabil, February 1, 2006; 39(1): 74 - 90.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
P.G. Aaron, R.M. Joshi, H. Palmer, N. Smith, and E. Kirby
Separating Genuine Cases of Reading Disability From Reading Deficits Caused by Predominantly Inattentive ADHD Behavior
J Learn Disabil, October 1, 2002; 35(5): 425 - 436.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
A. van der Leij and V. H. P. van Daal
Automatization Aspects of Dyslexia: Speed Limitations in Word Identification, Sensitivity to Increasing Task Demands, and Orthographic Compensation
J Learn Disabil, September 1, 1999; 32(5): 417 - 428.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
P.G. Aaron, M. Joshi, and K. A. Williams
Not All Reading Disabilities Are Alike
J Learn Disabil, March 1, 1999; 32(2): 120 - 137.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
N. A. Badian
Reading Disability Defined as a Discrepancy Betwveen Listening and Reading Comprehension: A Longitudinal Study of Stability, Gender Differences, and Prevalence
J Learn Disabil, March 1, 1999; 32(2): 138 - 148.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
R. P. Carver and S. W. Clark
Investigating Reading Disabilities Using the Rauding Diagnostic System
J Learn Disabil, September 1, 1998; 31(5): 453 - 471.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
J. E. J. Glez and M. R. Lopez
Is It True That the Differences in Reading Performance Between Students With and Without LD Cannot Be Explained by IQ?
J Learn Disabil, March 1, 1994; 27(3): 155 - 163.
[Abstract] [PDF]