|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Antecedent Knowledge and Intelligent Computer Assisted Instruction
John P. Woodward
John P. Woodward received his doctorate form the University of Oregon. He is presently a research associate in the Department of Special Education at the University of Oregon.
Douglas W. Carnine
Douglas W. Camine, who received his PhD from the University of Utah, is an associate pmfessor of special education at the University of Oregon. Woodward and Camine are eumntlyinvolvedin research funded by the Office of Special Education Programs in three areas of technology: advanced CAI systems, low cost networking and videodisc instruction. Address: John P. Woodward, Project Follow Through, 1751 Alder Trailer C, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403.
Intelligent Computer Assisted Instruction (ICAI) is an area of artificial intelligence that has received considerable attention from educators. Recently, special educators have taken an interest in this form of computer based instruction, particularly given the growing disappointment in traditional computer assisted instruction. This article reviews ICAI programs as they are typically conceptualized and notes their shortcomings for students with learning disabilities. The remainder of the article discusses ways in which ICAI programs could be useful to these students if sufficient attention is paid to antecedent knowledge; that is, a structured knowledge of the important facts, concepts, rules, and/or strategies of a particular content area. The authors argue that antecedent knowledge is taught best when content analysis and design techniques are used.
Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 21, No. 3,
131-139 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/002221948802100302

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Mastropieri, T. E. Scruggs, and K. Butcher
HOW EFFECTIVE IS INQUIRY LEARNING FOR STUDENTS WITH MILD DISABILITIES?
Journal of Special Education,
January 1, 1997;
31(2):
199 - 211.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. H. Raskind and E. L. Higgins
Reflections on Ethics, Technology, and Learning Disabilities: Avoiding the Consequences of Ill-Considered Action
J Learn Disabil,
August 1, 1995;
28(7):
425 - 438.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. J. Kameenui
Toward A Scientific Pedagogy of Learning Disabilities: A Sameness in the Message
J Learn Disabil,
June 1, 1991;
24(6):
364 - 372.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Woodward and J. Noell
Science Instruction at the Secondary Level: Implications for Students with Learning Disabilities
J Learn Disabil,
May 1, 1991;
24(5):
277 - 284.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Woodward
Procedural Knowledge in Mathematics: The Role of the Curriculum
J Learn Disabil,
April 1, 1991;
24(4):
242 - 251.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. P. Day and H. F. Sweitzer
Microcomputers: Tools for Creating Curriculum Modifications
Intervention in School and Clinic,
March 1, 1990;
25(4):
429 - 437.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. P. Day, R. H. Golden, and S. H. Frederick
Using Microcomputers for Instruction and Reinforcement of Study Skills
Intervention in School and Clinic,
March 1, 1989;
24(4):
461 - 470.
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|