This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Torgesen, J. K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Torgesen, J. K. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Learning Disorders Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Learning Disabilities Theory

Its Current State and Future Prospects

joseph K. Torgesen is with the Department of psychology at the Florida State University in Tallahassee. He is also an Associate Editor of the journal of Learning Disabilities, responsible for the topical Review section. Address: Joseph K. Torsen, PhD, Department of Psychology, Florida state University, Tallahassee, FL 32306.

Although theory has played an integral role in shaping prevailing practices in the LD field, broad overviews of paradigms and presentations of theoretical issues have been relatively infrequent and limited in scope. For instance, as has been made clear in preceding articles in this journal, a great deal of the discussion has been limited to and by definitional vagaries. Leaders concerned with the future have stressed the critical importance of an increased emphasis on theory development and the use of an improved theoretical base to guide future research and practice. There is a particular need at this time for greater explication and analysis of major controversies related to theories of cause and correction. For this article in the series, we asked Joe Torgesen to briefly review the status of theory in the LD field, to discuss its relationship to practice and to share his perspective of future directions for theory development. In doing so, he suggests the reasons for the present theoretical disarray, expresses optimism for future progress, and offers four recommendations to aid such progress. Subsequent articles in this series will amplify and extend Torgesen's presentation and aid practice by providing additional perspectives for differentiating learning disabilities from other learning problems, differentiating LD subtypes, and understanding cause and correction.-Howard S. Adelman, PhD and Linda Taylor, PhD, Guest Editors

Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 19, No. 7, 399-407 (1986)
DOI: 10.1177/002221948601900708


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. P. Bakken, M. A. Mastropieri, and T. E. Scruggs READING COMPREHENSION OF EXPOSITORY SCIENCE MATERIAL AND STUDENTS WITH LEARNING DISABILITIES: A COMPARISON OF STRATEGIES Journal of Special Education, January 1, 1997; 31(3): 300 - 324. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. D. Hammill A Brief Look at the Learning Disabilities Movement in the United States J Learn Disabil, May 1, 1993; 26(5): 295 - 310. [PDF]

				D. T. Kenny and E. Chekaluk Early Reading Performance: A Comparison of Teacher-Based and Test-Based Assessments J Learn Disabil, April 1, 1993; 26(4): 227 - 236. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. L. Deci, R. Hodges, L. Pierson, and J. Tomassone Autonomy and Competence as Motivational Factors in Students with Learning Disabilities and Emotional Handicaps J Learn Disabil, August 1, 1992; 25(7): 457 - 471. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. S. Grolnick and R. M. Ryan Self-Perceptions, Motivation, and Adjustment in Children with Learning Disabilities: A Multiple Group Comparison Study J Learn Disabil, March 1, 1990; 23(3): 177 - 184. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Montague, C. D. Maddux, and M. I. Dereshiwsky Story Grammar and Comprehension and Production of Narrative Prose by Students with Learning Disabilities J Learn Disabil, March 1, 1990; 23(3): 190 - 197. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Heshusius Holistic Principles: Not Enhancing the Old but Seeing A-new. A Rejoinder J Learn Disabil, December 1, 1989; 22(10): 595 - 601. [PDF]

				L. Heshusius The Newtonian Mechanistic Paradigm, Special Education, and Contours of Alternatives: An Overview J Learn Disabil, August 1, 1989; 22(7): 403 - 415. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. G. Licht and J. K. Torgesen Natural Science Approaches to Questions of Subjectivity J Learn Disabil, August 1, 1989; 22(7): 418 - 419. [PDF]

				M. S. Poplin The Reductionistic Fallacy in Learning Disabilities: Replicating the Past by Reducing the Present J Learn Disabil, August 1, 1988; 21(7): 389 - 400. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. N. Switzky and G. F. Schultz Intrinsic Motivation and Learning Performance: Implications for Individual Educational Programming for Learners with Mild Handicaps Remedial and Special Education, July 1, 1988; 9(4): 7 - 14. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. L. Deci and C. L. Chandler The Importance of Motivation for the Future of the LD Field J Learn Disabil, December 1, 1986; 19(10): 587 - 594. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. J. Gallagher Learning Disabilities and Special Education: A Critique J Learn Disabil, December 1, 1986; 19(10): 595 - 601. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. S. Adelman and L. Taylor Moving the LD Field Ahead: New Paths, New Paradigms J Learn Disabil, December 1, 1986; 19(10): 602 - 608. [Abstract] [PDF]