Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Learning Disabilities
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Badian, N. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Badian, N. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Improving the Prediction of Reading for the Individual Child

A Four-Year Follow-Up

Nathlie A. Badian, EdD

Nathlie A. Badian received her EdD from Boston University in the field of special education. She is currently a Consulting Teacher for the Holbrook Public Schools and a Research Fellow in Neurology at The Children's Hospital Medical Center in Boston. Address: Nathlie A. Badian, EdD, 101 Monroe Road, Quincy, MA 02169.

In a follow-up of 208 boys, the 16 who scored low on a prekindergarten screening battery, but were satisfactory readers four years later, were compared with 13 others, who were low on both prekindergarten and reading measures. All but two of the 16 good readers, but only one poor reader, were classified by criteria consisting mainly of biographical variables. Four sets of biographical and screening data, applied to the 179 boys who scored above the screening cutoff, identified 16 of 17 who became poor readers, but only one good reader. The four subgroups identified resembled subtypes of reading disability found by some researchers.

Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 19, No. 5, 262-269 (1986)
DOI: 10.1177/002221948601900502


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
H. G. Taylor, M. Anselmo, A. L. Foreman, C. Schatschneider, and J. Angelopoulos
Utility of Kindergarten Teacher Judgments in Identifying Early Learning Problems
J Learn Disabil, March 1, 2000; 33(2): 200 - 210.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
N. A. Badian
The Prediction of Good and Poor Reading Before Kindergarten Entry: A Nine-Year Follow-Up
J Learn Disabil, February 1, 1988; 21(2): 98 - 103.
[Abstract] [PDF]