This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Franklin, M. R. Articles by Sabers, D. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Franklin, M. R., Jr. Articles by Sabers, D. L. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Woodcock Analogies

Effect of Additional Practice and Instruction for Learning-Disabled Students

Richard M. Fullilove, MA

Darrell L. Sabers, PhD

The Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests-Revised uses three formats for testing word comprehension, one of which is the analogies format. The adequacy of the revised instructions for the analogies portion of the Word Comprehension (WC) subtest was examined with a learning-disabled population. The effect of presenting 15 additional sample items prior to administration of the analogies items was examined using a Solomon Four-Group design. Analysis of covariance demonstrated significant increases in WC-analogies standard scores.

Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 18, No. 9, 521-523 (1985)
DOI: 10.1177/002221948501800904


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?