Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Learning Disabilities
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Swanson, H. L.
Right arrow Articles by Obrzut, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Swanson, H. L.
Right arrow Articles by Obrzut, J. E.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Learning Disorders
*Memory
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Learning Disabled Readers' Recall as a Function of Distinctive Encoding, Hemisphere Processing and Selective Attention

H. Lee Swanson, PhD

John E. Obrzut, PhD

This study tested the assumption that learning disabled children have limited word knowledge structures and such limitations influence hemispheric processing. Two competing theoretical accounts were also tested. Learning disabled and nondisabled readers were compared on dichotic listening recall tasks that included semantic, phonemic and structural orienting instructions. Dependent measures were degree of lateralization, free recall, clustering, and selective attention. As expected, recall increases were a function of group, orienting instructions, and level of word processing. Most importantly, the results clearly demonstrated that group recall differences interact with orienting instructions. The ability group differences in dichotic listening were attributed to word knowledge (ability to activate word features congruent with the orienting task) rather than differences in hemispheric capacity or selective attention, per se.

Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 18, No. 7, 409-418 (1985)
DOI: 10.1177/002221948501800709


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
H. S. Adelman
Commentaries
J Learn Disabil, March 1, 1987; 20(3): 166 - 171.
[PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
J. K. Torgesen
Learning Disabilities Theory: Its Current State and Future Prospects
J Learn Disabil, August 1, 1986; 19(7): 399 - 407.
[Abstract] [PDF]