Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Learning Disabilities
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holzman, T. G.
Right arrow Articles by Payne, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Holzman, T. G.
Right arrow Articles by Payne, M. C., Jr.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Duration-Syntax Association in Normal and Poor Readers

Thomas G. Holzman, PhD

Dr. Holzman is affiliated with the Georgia State University and Dr. Payne with the Georgia Institute of Technology.

M. Carr Payne, Jr., PhD

Address: Dr. M. C. Payne Jr., School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332.

Fifty-five poor readers and fifty-eight normal readers from grade six were presented a modified version of Hamill's (1976) tone pattern-phrase matching procedure. Each student selected from two type-written alternatives the phrase which appeared to match an auditory tone pattern. Consistent with Hamill's adults, subjects tended to choose phrases which matched long tone durations to content words and short durations to function words. Although both reading groups displayed this tendency, it was more prominent in the normal readers. These results cannot be explained on the basis of knowledge of word importance, because on a second task poor readers were better able to identify important words in phrases than were normal readers.

Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 18, No. 10, 585-587 (1985)
DOI: 10.1177/002221948501801004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?