Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Learning Disabilities
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Das, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Mancini, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Das, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Mancini, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Performance of Good and Poor Readers on Cognitive Tasks

Changes With Development and Reading Competence

J. P. Das, PhD

J. P. Das is a professor of educational psychology at the University of Alberta, Canada. He received his PhD in psychology from the University of London.

Gay L. Bisanz, PhD

Gay Bisanz is an assistant professor of psychology at the University of Alberta. She received her PhD in psychology from the University of Pittsburgh.

Gabriel Mancini, PhD

Gabriel Mancini received her PhD in educational psychology from the University of Alberta. Address: Dr. J. P. Das, Centre for the Study of Mental Retardation, 6–123D Education North. University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2G5.

Average and backward readers from Grades 2, 4, and 6 were examined for their performance on five cognitive tasks, three of which measured memory span. The subjects were selected in such a manner that backward readers in Grade 4 were matched on word-reading with average readers in Grade 2, and the backward readers in Grade 6 were matched with average readers in Grade 4. The purpose of the study was to determine if cognitive task performance improves with age and with reading ability; and further, if the matched groups have equivalent performance on the five tasks. Results were consistent with a developmental trend and increment with reading competence. No differences were obtained between matched groups, which would support a developmental lag rather than a deficit position in the interpretation of reading backwardness. Overall findings were discussed in the context of explaining reading disability in terms of strategies for allocating attentional resources.

Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 17, No. 9, 549-555 (1984)
DOI: 10.1177/002221948401700909


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentHome page
J. A. Naglieri and J. P. Das
Planning, Attention, Simultaneous, and Successive (PASS) Cognitive Processes as a Model for Intelligence
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, September 1, 1990; 8(3): 303 - 337.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
N. J. Riley
Piagetian Cognitive Functioning in Students With Learning Disabilities
J Learn Disabil, August 1, 1989; 22(7): 444 - 451.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentHome page
J. A. Naglieri and J. P. Das
Construct and Criterion-Related Validity of Planning, Simultaneous, and Successive Cognitive Processing Tasks
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, December 1, 1987; 5(4): 353 - 363.
[Abstract] [PDF]