|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Improving Spelling Performance By Imitating A Child's Errors
Jo Ann Hiroshige Nulman, MA
Jo Ann Hiroshige Nulman is a doctoral student. She received her MA in special education from the University of California, Santa Barbara.
Michael M. Gerber, Ph.D.
Michael Gerber is an assistant professor in the graduate school of education. He received his PhD in special education from the University of California, Santa Barbara.Address: Dr. Gerber, Special Education Program, Graduate School of Education, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106.
Various self-correction procedures have been used to improve spelling performance oflearning handicapped students, but few studies have been concerned with qualitative changes in spelling attempts during intervention. This study focused on both the qualitative and quantitative changes in spelling performance of a learning disabled student whe a contingent imitation and modeling procedure was used. Sufficient number of trials were allowed to assure learning. Results indicated significant improvement in the number of correctly spelled words. On a test for transfer, using orthographically and phonetically similar words, performance was slightly improved over pretest performance on the training list. However, analysis of error quality revealed substantial improvement in ability. Effectiveness of the imitation and modeling procedures was replicated. The data also extended previous work by providing a basis for explaining effectiveness of these procedures for spelling instruction. The usefulness of a problem-solving model of spelling acquisition in learning handicapped students is discussed. However, caution is advised when using this procedure since some students may view contigent imitation and modeling as punishing.
Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 17, No. 6,
328-333 (1984)
DOI: 10.1177/002221948401700604

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. A. Ochoa, L. R. Vasquez, and M. M. Gerber
New Generation of Computer-Assisted Learning Tools for Students with Disabilities
Intervention in School and Clinic,
March 1, 1999;
34(4):
251 - 254.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. M. Fulk and M. Stormont-Spurgin
SPELLING INTERVENTIONS FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES: A REVIEW
Journal of Special Education,
January 1, 1995;
28(4):
488 - 513.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Vaughn, J. S. Schumm, and J. Gordon
Which Motoric Condition Is Most Effective for Teaching Spelling to Students With and Without Learning Disabilities?
J Learn Disabil,
March 1, 1993;
26(3):
191 - 198.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. A. Kearney and R. S. Drabman
The Write--Say Method for Improving Spelling Accuracy in Children with Learning Disabilities
J Learn Disabil,
January 1, 1993;
26(1):
52 - 56.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. L. Dangel
The Use of Student-Directed Spelling Strategies
Intervention in School and Clinic,
September 1, 1989;
25(1):
43 - 51.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. M. Gerber and R. J. Hall
Information Processing Approaches to Studying Spelling Deficiencies
J Learn Disabil,
January 1, 1987;
20(1):
34 - 42.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. M. Gerber
Generalization of Spelling Strategies by LD Students as a Result of Contingent Imitation/Modeling and Mastery Criteria
J Learn Disabil,
November 1, 1986;
19(9):
530 - 537.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. James
Self-Selected Spelling
Intervention in School and Clinic,
May 1, 1986;
21(5):
557 - 563.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. S. Englert, E. H. Hiebert, and S. R. Stewart
Spelling Unfamiliar Words By an Analogy Strategy
Journal of Special Education,
October 1, 1985;
19(3):
291 - 306.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|