Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Learning Disabilities
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Badian, N. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Badian, N. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Can the WPPSI be of Aid in Identifying Young Children at Risk for Reading Disability

Nathlie A. Badian, EdD

Nataiie A. Badian is a consulting teacher for Holbrook, Massachusetts Public Schools and a research fellow in neurology at the Children's Hospital Medical Center, Boston. She received her EdD in special education from Boston University. Address: Dr. Badian, 101 Monroe Road, Quincy. MA 02169.

WPPSI and screening test scores of 72 children, who appeared at risk for learning disability at age 5, were examined 3 years later, on average. At follow-up there were 32 poor and 40 good readers. Both groups had average intelligence at age 5, and had received similar special help. Poor readers were superior in WPPSI Conceptual and Acquired Knowledge factors, and Verbal IQ. Good readers were superior only on five screening tests. Profiles were Conceptual>Spatial>Sequential for poor readers, and Spatial>Sequential>Conceptual for good readers. As abilities important in the acquisition of reading skills differ from those associated with later good reading, educators should not expect young high risk children to show the Spatial>Conceptual>Sequential profile, reported for older children with reading disability in WISC-R research. No boys who became poor readers showed this profile at age 5, although nearly half the small number of girls did.

Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 17, No. 10, 583-587 (1984)
DOI: 10.1177/002221948401701003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Assessment for Effective InterventionHome page
D. J. Majsterek and E. N. Lord
An Evaluation of the PPVT-R and VMI for Screening Preschoolers Who Are At Risk for Reading Disabilities
Assessment for Effective Intervention, January 1, 1991; 16(2-3): 173 - 179.
[Abstract] [PDF]