This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Frame, R. E. Articles by Porter, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Frame, R. E. Articles by Porter, A. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Diagnostic and Prescriptive Bias in School Psychologists' Reports of a Learning Disabled Child

Roger E. Frame is a school psychologist for the Collier County public schools. He received his PhD degree in school psychology from Michigan State University.

Harvey F. Clarizio, EdD

Harvey F. Clarizio is a professor and director of the School Psychology program. He received his EdD degree in educational psychology from the University of Illinois.

Andrew Porter, PhD

Andrew Porter is a professor of education. He received his PhD degree in educational psychology from the University of Wisconsin at Madison. Address: Dr. Harvey Clarizion, Michigan State University, College of Education, 461 Erickson Hall, East Lansing, Ml 48824.

Twenty-four experienced school psychologists independently assessed a simulated learning disability case of a fourth grade girl. Bias due to the child's race, socioeconomic status, and the reading level of the child's home school was analyzed with both an unprompted report written by each subject (recall), and a checklist of descriptive and prescriptive statements about the case (recognition). Only 17 of the 744 possible diagnostic main effects and 2-way interactions which might indicate bias were significant at p<.01, while seven such differences would be expected purely by chance. No statements about intelligence, classroom behavior, or social relationships had statistically significant differences. However, the simulated low SES black child did tend to be classified as "not eligible for special education" much more often than either the white or upper class black child on both the written reports and on the checklist, while the upper SES child was labelled learning disabled more frequently than the low SES child on the recognized checklist. Other main effects and interactions were also noted in some statements about developmental history, arithmetic achievement, perceptual-motor integration, and excessive dependence.

Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 17, No. 1, 12-15 (1984)
DOI: 10.1177/002221948401700105


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. P. Rivera Mathematics Education and Students with Learning Disabilities: Introduction to the Special Series J Learn Disabil, January 1, 1997; 30(1): 2 - 19. [PDF]