Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Learning Disabilities
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mattes, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mattes, J. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Feingold Diet

A Current Reappraisal

Jeffrey A. Mattes, MD

Jeffrey A. Mattes is a staff psychiatrist at the Carrier Foundation. He was formerly the medical direcior of ihe Child Developmeni Clinic at Long Island Jewish-Hillside Medical Center. He received his MD degree from Jefferson Medical College.

The Feingold diet, eliminating artificial colorings, artificial flavorings, and salicylates, has been claimed, based on anecdotal evidence, to improve the learning and behavior of hyperactive children. A review of all published, completed controlled studies, however, indicates that the Feingold diet is probably not effective, except perhaps in a very small percentage of children. The positive results in a few studies have been inconsistent between studies and greatly outnumbered by negative results. Even among children whose parents feel the diet has helped them greatly, the improvement seems more often a placebo effect, e.g., due to the increased attention the child is receiving, than a true effect of artificial colorings or flavorings.

Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 16, No. 6, 319-323 (1983)
DOI: 10.1177/002221948301600602
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Learn DisabilHome page
L. B. Silver
A Review of the Current Controversial Approaches for Treating Learning Disabilities
J Learn Disabil, October 1, 1987; 20(8): 498 - 504.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
L. B. Silver
Controversial Approaches to Treating Learning Disabilities and Attention Deficit Disorder
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, October 1, 1986; 140(10): 1045 - 1052.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J Learn DisabilHome page
Forum
J Learn Disabil, December 1, 1983; 16(10): 574 - 575.
[PDF]