Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Learning Disabilities
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gaskins, I. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gaskins, I. W.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Learning Disorders
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Let's End the Reading Disabilities/Learning Disabilities Debate

Irene W. Gaskins, EdD

Irene W. Gaskins is director of the Benchmark School in Media, Pennsylvania, and lecturer at the University of Pennsylvania. She received her EdD degree from the University of Pennsylvania in educational psychology. Requests for reprints should be addressed to her at 2107 N. Providence Rd., Medic PA 19063.

The question of who should teach a poor reader is ofen determined by a label. Yet the experts who do the labeling do not agree on a clearly definitive w y to decide whether a poor reader should be labeled reading disabled or learning disabled. Further, labels have not proved to be helpful in determining treatment. In view of these facts and the fact that imprwed reading is the most common academic need of children labeled learning disabled or reading disabled, it appears that the fields of reading and learning disabilities should merge to create one strong field. Recommendations for creating this merger are given.

Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 15, No. 2, 81-83 (1982)
DOI: 10.1177/002221948201500203


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
K. A. Kavale
Identifying Specific Learning Disability: Is Responsiveness to Intervention the Answer?
J Learn Disabil, December 1, 2005; 38(6): 553 - 562.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
K. A. Kavale and S. R. Forness
What Definitions of Learning Disability Say and Don't Say: A Critical Analysis
J Learn Disabil, May 1, 2000; 33(3): 239 - 256.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
P. G. Aaron
Can Reading Disabilities Be Diagnosed Without Using Intelligence Tests?
J Learn Disabil, March 1, 1991; 24(3): 178 - 186.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
P. G. Aaron, S. Phillips, and S. Larsen
Specific Reading Disability in Historically Famous Persons
J Learn Disabil, November 1, 1988; 21(9): 523 - 537.
[PDF]


Home page
Remedial and Special EducationHome page
K. A. Kavale and S. R. Forness
Learning Disability and the History of Science: Paradigm or Paradox?
Remedial and Special Education, July 1, 1985; 6(4): 12 - 24.
[Abstract] [PDF]