Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Learning Disabilities
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McNutt, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Li, J. C.-Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McNutt, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Li, J. C.-Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Repetition of Time-Altered Sentences by Normal and Learning Disabled Children

James C. McNutt, PhD

Kent State University, McGill University

Janice Chia-Yen Li, MS

University of Toronto, McGill University

The present study was designed to assess the effect of various rates of compressed and expanded sentences on the performance of 10 learning disabled children and 10 normal children to determine whether the auditory difficulties of the children were characterized by deficiencies in processing especially rapid or especially slow speech. Children repeated sentences composed of five to 17 morphemes presented at normal rates, at 60% and 30% compression, and at 30% and 60% expansion. The normal children repeated the sentences equally well at all rates and were more accurate than the learning disabled children at each rate. In the learning disabled group performance was less accurate at the fastest rate but equally accurate at all other rates. These findings suggest a semantic or syntactic deficit in the processing of rapidly presented auditory material rather than a deficit in short-term memory.

Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 13, No. 1, 30-34 (1980)
DOI: 10.1177/002221948001300107


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
D. A. Abrams, T. Nicol, S. Zecker, and N. Kraus
Abnormal Cortical Processing of the Syllable Rate of Speech in Poor Readers
J. Neurosci., June 17, 2009; 29(24): 7686 - 7693.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
C. A. Eberwein, S. R. Pratt, M. R. McNeil, T. R. D. Fossett, N. J. Szuminsky, and P. J. Doyle
Auditory Performance Characteristics of the Computerized Revised Token Test (CRTT)
J Speech Lang Hear Res, August 1, 2007; 50(4): 865 - 877.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Special EducationHome page
J. A. Salvia and C. J. Meisel
Observer Bias: A Methodological Consideration in Special Education Research
Journal of Special Education, July 1, 1980; 14(2): 261 - 270.
[Abstract] [PDF]