Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Learning Disabilities
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sutherland, J.
Right arrow Articles by Algozzine, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sutherland, J.
Right arrow Articles by Algozzine, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Learning Disabled Label as a Biasing Factor in the Visual Motor Performance of Normal Children

John Sutherland, PhD

Bob Algozzine, PhD

That the application of disability labels to children can affect their performance has been widely claimed by labeling critics but not clearly demonstrated. The present investigation addresses the question of whether the application of the specific label "learning disabilities" could affect the complex visual-motor integration performance of normal fourth-graders. Student experimenters individually trained and tested eight children who had been randomly selected and labeled either learning disabled or normal. Each child's performance was scored subjectively by the student experimenter and objectively by an event recorder. Results indicated that girls represented to experimenters as learning disabled performed significantly lower on a task of complex visual-motor integration than girls represented as normal. The performance of boys was not significantly affected. Expectancy effects were shown not to be a product of observer bias or recording error and were found in general and specific performance measures.

Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 12, No. 1, 8-14 (1979)
DOI: 10.1177/002221947901200103


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
J. H. Sutherland, B. Algozzine, J. E. Ysseldyke, and S. Freeman
Changing Peer Perceptions: Effects of Labels and Assigned Attributes
J Learn Disabil, April 1, 1983; 16(4): 217 - 220.
[Abstract] [PDF]